IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rjbsxx/v39y2024i3p525-543.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Colonial Cartograhy: A Hidden Crucible of the Migingo Conflict

Author

Listed:
  • Jacqueline Namukasa
  • Pamela Khanakwa
  • Rutanga Murindwa

Abstract

Scholars have extensively studied the ways in which colonial borders configure the African continent. In East Africa, studies have demonstrated that the colonial naturalized inter-state boundaries have been a source of territorial conflicts. Focusing on the Uganda-Kenya conflict over Migingo Island, this article examines the forces that shaped the demands and claims of either state over the island. Migingo is a rocky islet in Lake Victoria that has been a contested ground between Uganda and Kenya since 2009. Drawing on colonial maps, reports, documents and interviews with Ministry Officials, the paper argues that imperial cartography in East Africa is flawed and cannot resolve the Migingo conundrum. It further reveals that the various joint-survey commissions have failed to re-affirm the borderline because of the inconsistences and ambiguities encompassed in colonial delineations and mappings. It thus calls for negotiations to address this maritime imbroglio between the two states.

Suggested Citation

  • Jacqueline Namukasa & Pamela Khanakwa & Rutanga Murindwa, 2024. "Colonial Cartograhy: A Hidden Crucible of the Migingo Conflict," Journal of Borderlands Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(3), pages 525-543, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rjbsxx:v:39:y:2024:i:3:p:525-543
    DOI: 10.1080/08865655.2022.2151035
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/08865655.2022.2151035
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/08865655.2022.2151035?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rjbsxx:v:39:y:2024:i:3:p:525-543. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rjbs20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.