IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rjbsxx/v38y2023i5p723-744.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Border Security Meets Black Mirror: Perceptions of Technologization from the Windsor Borderland

Author

Listed:
  • Patrick C. Lalonde

Abstract

This article combines findings concerning institutional discourses with knowledge of frontline officials and non-officials gleaned from qualitative interviews with border services officers (BSOs) and travelers living and working in the Windsor, Ontario, Canada borderland to discuss the technologization of modern Canadian borders. Findings generated from interview data reveal that both frontline officials and non-officials experience a border where the personal narrative and performativity of the embodied subject traveler is increasingly irrelevant, with officer decision-making supplanted by information contained in databases. Findings also explore various dangers associated with increased simulation and cyborg work, including database errors having demonstrable consequences on the mobility and rights of human beings; the colonization of the lifeworld of BSOs by digitized risk technologies ultimately rendering officers incapable of asking questions, looking for indicators, and making informed decisions on the basis of anything other than databases; and the associated human rights, privacy, and legal implications that are potentially wide-ranging and extremely troubling.

Suggested Citation

  • Patrick C. Lalonde, 2023. "Border Security Meets Black Mirror: Perceptions of Technologization from the Windsor Borderland," Journal of Borderlands Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(5), pages 723-744, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:rjbsxx:v:38:y:2023:i:5:p:723-744
    DOI: 10.1080/08865655.2021.1968927
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/08865655.2021.1968927
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/08865655.2021.1968927?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rjbsxx:v:38:y:2023:i:5:p:723-744. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rjbs20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.