IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rjbsxx/v35y2020i4p619-639.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Transborder People, Connected History: Border and Relationships in the Indo-Burma Borderlands

Author

Listed:
  • Pum Khan Pau

Abstract

The paper presents the perspective of “transborder peoples” who constitute the minority in the states in which they live but have “connected history.” It probes how indigenous notions of space, territory, and identity had been displaced, reconfigured and fragmented by colonial map-making, territoriality, and classifications in the Indo-Burma borderlands, a less known “peripheral” area which has for far too long been only seen from the perspective of the colonial and postcolonial states. The paper examines to what extent are the Indo-Burma borderlands a space where one can see decay and revival of relationships among the transborder people. Moving beyond state-centric conceptions of the border as “fixed lines,” the paper gives emphasis on the “duality” or “paradoxical character” of the borderlands. It argues that while colonial and postcolonial borders divided indigenous communities thereby creating “difference” or “otherness,” it also “unifies” and facilitates revival of relationships among the “transborder peoples” through dialogue, interaction and exchange across the border. It is a case study of the Zo people of the Indo-Burma borderlands.

Suggested Citation

  • Pum Khan Pau, 2020. "Transborder People, Connected History: Border and Relationships in the Indo-Burma Borderlands," Journal of Borderlands Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(4), pages 619-639, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rjbsxx:v:35:y:2020:i:4:p:619-639
    DOI: 10.1080/08865655.2018.1438914
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/08865655.2018.1438914
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/08865655.2018.1438914?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rjbsxx:v:35:y:2020:i:4:p:619-639. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rjbs20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.