IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rjbsxx/v32y2017i4p557-576.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Merits of Reciprocity: Small-town Twinning in the Wake of the Second World War

Author

Listed:
  • Andreas Langenohl

Abstract

This paper argues that the sociality of town twinning in Europe since the Second World War has been organized around relationships of reciprocal exchange, for instance, the exchange of visits, hospitality, and gifts. While the paper empirically refers to a qualitative study of forms of twinning sociality in small towns in Germany, it conceptually frames the findings in terms of anthropological theories of exchange. The latter are relevant for the paper because they articulate doubts regarding the capacity of reciprocal exchange to effect sustainable social cohesion. However, in the case of town twinning after the Second World War, this theoretical argument must be differentiated in order to account for a historical constellation in which twinning attempted to forge links between members of former enemy nations. Under such conditions, strictly reciprocal twinning exchange, although receding to the background today, proved to be functional because it required only minimal investments and expectations regarding mutual understanding, affectivity, or even communication. Thus, reciprocity was ideally suited to accomplish an, in historical terms, utterly unlikely result, namely, to forge and re-establish connections among people who were not only perfect strangers but also former enemies.

Suggested Citation

  • Andreas Langenohl, 2017. "The Merits of Reciprocity: Small-town Twinning in the Wake of the Second World War," Journal of Borderlands Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(4), pages 557-576, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rjbsxx:v:32:y:2017:i:4:p:557-576
    DOI: 10.1080/08865655.2016.1244648
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/08865655.2016.1244648
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/08865655.2016.1244648?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rjbsxx:v:32:y:2017:i:4:p:557-576. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rjbs20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.