IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rjapxx/v18y2013i4p634-653.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Small versus large manufacturing units: how efficient are they?

Author

Listed:
  • Bishwanath Goldar
  • Arup Mitra

Abstract

Keeping in mind the much discussed huge employment potential of small manufacturing units, this study examines the performance of enterprises across organised or formal and unorganised or informal sector enterprises. The analysis tends to offer little evidence in favour of positive links between sectors in terms of performance index, i.e. technical efficiency. The formal sector units obviously are better performers than their informal sector counterparts. The informal sector units are not able to benefit in the process of rapid overall growth, suggesting that growth is not inclusive. The demand side factor or agglomeration-specific factor also does not seem to impact on the performance of the informal sector enterprises favourably. On the other hand, the organized manufacturing sector, covered by ASI (annual survey of industries) is responsive to increases in income, which possibly can be explained in terms of the quality differences in the products manufactured by the formal and the informal sectors. The infrastructure variables also do not show a positive effect on the informal sector, while the formal sector efficiency improves with a rise in the availability of infrastructure. On the whole, the informal sector enterprises exist only to provide means of survival; they seem to lack all dynamism.

Suggested Citation

  • Bishwanath Goldar & Arup Mitra, 2013. "Small versus large manufacturing units: how efficient are they?," Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(4), pages 634-653.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:rjapxx:v:18:y:2013:i:4:p:634-653
    DOI: 10.1080/13547860.2013.827416
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13547860.2013.827416
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13547860.2013.827416?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jeffrey D. Sachs & Nirupam Bajpai & Ananthi Ramiah, 2002. "Understanding Regional Economic Growth in India," Asian Economic Papers, MIT Press, vol. 1(3), pages 32-62.
    2. Jeffrey D. Sachs & Ananthi Ramiah & Nirupam Bajpai, 2002. "Understanding Regional Economic Growth in India," CID Working Papers 88, Center for International Development at Harvard University.
    3. Hasan, Rana & L. Jandoc, Karl Robert, 2010. "The Distribution of Firm Size in India: What Can Survey Data Tell Us?," ADB Economics Working Paper Series 213, Asian Development Bank.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. K. L. Krishna & Bishwanath Goldar & Suresh Chand Aggarwal & Deb Kusum Das & Abdul A. Erumban & Pilu Chandra Das, 2018. "Productivity Growth and Levels - A comparison of Formal and Informal Manufacturing in India," Working papers 291, Centre for Development Economics, Delhi School of Economics.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sulekha Hembram & Souparna Maji & Sushil Kr. Haldar, 2019. "Club Convergence among the Major Indian States During 1982–2014: Does Investment in Human Capital Matter?," South Asia Economic Journal, Institute of Policy Studies of Sri Lanka, vol. 20(2), pages 184-204, September.
    2. Stanley L. Winer & J. Stephen Ferris & Bharatee Bhusana Dash & Pinaki Chakraborty, 2021. "Political competitiveness and the private–public structure of public expenditure: a model and empirics for the Indian States," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 28(6), pages 1430-1471, December.
    3. Kumar, Surender & Managi, Shunsuke, 2012. "Productivity and convergence in India: A state-level analysis," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 23(5), pages 548-559.
    4. repec:dau:papers:123456789/4295 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Tobias Franz, 2019. "Why ‘Good Governance’ Fails: Lessons from Regional Economic Development in Colombia," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(4), pages 776-785, July.
    6. Sudhir K. Thakur, 2008. "Identification of Regional Fundamental Economic Structure (FES) of India: An Input-Output and Field of Influence Approach," WIDER Working Paper Series RP2008-59, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    7. Saibal Ghosh, 2010. "Does Political Competition Matter for Economic Performance? Evidence from Sub‐national Data," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 58(5), pages 1030-1048, December.
    8. Lee , Woong, 2015. "Estimating Regional Matching Efficiency in the Indian Labor Market: State-Level Panel Data for 1999-2013," Working Papers 15-3, Korea Institute for International Economic Policy.
    9. Shingal, ANIRUDH, 2010. "Services growth and convergence: Getting India’s states together," MPRA Paper 32813, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Aparna P Lolayekar & Pranab Mukhopadhyay, 2020. "“Understanding growth convergence in India (1981–2010): Looking beyond the usual suspects”," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(6), pages 1-17, June.
    11. Saibal Ghosh, 2013. "The economics and politics of output volatility: evidence from Indian states," International Review of Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(1), pages 110-134, January.
    12. repec:bla:rdevec:v:14:y:2010:i:s1:p:447-465 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. R. V. Dadibhavi, 2019. "Regional Disparities, Growth and Divergence in Income in Karnataka," Review of Development and Change, , vol. 24(1), pages 55-78, June.
    14. Tomasz Brodzicki, 2017. "The Role of Openness in Regional Economic Growth. The Case of Polish and Spanish NUTS-2 Regions," Collegium of Economic Analysis Annals, Warsaw School of Economics, Collegium of Economic Analysis, issue 47, pages 43-64.
    15. Agarwalla, Astha & Pangotra, Prem, 2011. "Regional Income Disparities in India and Test for Convergence - 1980 to 2006," IIMA Working Papers WP2011-01-04, Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, Research and Publication Department.
    16. Rashmi Umesh Arora, 2012. "Finance and inequality: a study of Indian states," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(34), pages 4527-4538, December.
    17. Kristin Roll, 2013. "Measuring performance, development and growth when restricting flexibility," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 39(1), pages 15-25, February.
    18. Sabine D’Costa & Jose Enrique Garcilazo & Joaquim Oliveira Martins, 2019. "Impact of macro‐structural reforms on the productivity growth of regions: Distance to the frontier matters," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 98(1), pages 133-166, February.
    19. Ramachandran, Renjith & Sasidharan, Subash & Doytch, Nadia, 2020. "Foreign direct investment and industrial agglomeration: Evidence from India," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 44(4).
    20. Shabari Paul Dey & Debasis Neogi, 2015. "Testing Sigma and Unconditional Beta Convergence of GDP for SAARC Countries: Can Inclusion of China further Consolidate the Convergence?," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 16(5), pages 845-855, October.
    21. Friedt, Felix L. & Toner-Rodgers, Aidan, 2022. "Natural disasters, intra-national FDI spillovers, and economic divergence: Evidence from India," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    22. Zhang, Xiaobo & Fan, Shenggen, 2002. "Infrastructure, Openness, And Regional Inequality In India," 2002 Annual meeting, July 28-31, Long Beach, CA 19902, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rjapxx:v:18:y:2013:i:4:p:634-653. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rjap .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.