IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rgfmxx/v7y2016i4p238-251.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comforting or rewarding myself: Choices for self-gifting

Author

Listed:
  • Hee Jin Hur
  • Ho Jung Choo

Abstract

This study aimed to empirically explore consumers’ preferred self-gift products depending on the motivation to give self-gifts. Perceiving the distinctive motivations for self-gifts led to the postulation of likely distinctiveness in selecting types of attractiveness-relevant products (enhancing vs. problem-solving products) for self-gifts. Two empirical studies were conducted to test the hypotheses with 319 female consumers in their 20s and 30s. Study 1 was an experiment through which different preferences were tested and verified. Here, two types of attractiveness-relevant products showed differing preference levels when the motivation was to give a self-gift reward, thus representing a therapeutic motive. This study also revealed that among enhancing and problem-solving products, experiential products and material products showed different levels of preferences. Study 2 was conducted to provide empirical evidence of the moderating effect of regulatory focus on product type preferences and self-gift motivation. This study expanded the scope of the research in this field as it examined consumer behaviors regarding self-gifts and linked consumer motivations to give self-gifts with relevant product types. We also clarified that different situations exist for self-gift consumption and the preferred products vary depending on a consumer’s motivation to give a self-gift.

Suggested Citation

  • Hee Jin Hur & Ho Jung Choo, 2016. "Comforting or rewarding myself: Choices for self-gifting," Journal of Global Fashion Marketing, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(4), pages 238-251, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rgfmxx:v:7:y:2016:i:4:p:238-251
    DOI: 10.1080/20932685.2016.1198239
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/20932685.2016.1198239
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/20932685.2016.1198239?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rgfmxx:v:7:y:2016:i:4:p:238-251. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rgfm .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.