IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rgfmxx/v16y2025i2p231-256.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How do luxury fashion communities express negativity? A netnographic approach

Author

Listed:
  • Mafalda Jacques dos Santos Barata
  • Amélia Brandão
  • Jitpisut Bubphapant
  • Sunny Vijay Arora

Abstract

This study investigates the antecedents of consumers’ negativity towards luxury fashion brands within online communities and how they express such negativity. The study adopted a symbolic netnographic approach to two online platforms, focusing on two luxury brands, Louis Vuitton and Michael Kors. The results of a non-intrusive content analysis indicate that misconduct in corporate social responsibility (CSR) actions, the non-delivery of promised values of quality and services, and the mismatch of consumer-brand identification proved to be sources of negativity. Thus, consumers express their displeasure through brand hate, avoidance, aversion, anti-consumption behavior, distancing themselves from brands, and boycotting, among others. Furthermore, the study also proposes a comprehensive table and visual framework that summarize the antecedents of negativity, explained by respective theories, and negative emotional dimensions, leading to negative behavioral reactions. It reflects the gap, extends previous literature on negative consumer-brand relationships and luxury brands, and provides valuable insights for managing luxury fashion brands.

Suggested Citation

  • Mafalda Jacques dos Santos Barata & Amélia Brandão & Jitpisut Bubphapant & Sunny Vijay Arora, 2025. "How do luxury fashion communities express negativity? A netnographic approach," Journal of Global Fashion Marketing, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(2), pages 231-256, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rgfmxx:v:16:y:2025:i:2:p:231-256
    DOI: 10.1080/20932685.2024.2420623
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/20932685.2024.2420623
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/20932685.2024.2420623?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rgfmxx:v:16:y:2025:i:2:p:231-256. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rgfm .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.