Author
Listed:
- Clare D’Souza
- Winnie Wong
- Nicole El Haber
- Anne Renée Brouwer
- Outi Niininen
Abstract
Given the rapid growth of online buying, there seems to be a significant gap in understanding how consumers derive satisfaction from their past online fashion purchases, particularly in the absence of tactile experiences, relying solely on visual aesthetics for both planned and impulse decisions. This gap examines the necessity of evaluating how online shopping platforms should cater to diverse consumer behaviors. The goal is to examine how the visual aesthetic attributes of fashion clothing purchased online, whether through impulse or planned decisions, can influence satisfaction through a conceptualized model. It incorporates several variables’ mediating and moderating roles for a more plausible explanation. Two distinct samples were drawn from consumers who independently made planned purchases and those who made impulse purchases, totalling 483 respondents in the survey. Multigroup Structural Equation Modeling was employed for data analysis. The findings reveal that visual aesthetics significantly and positively impact perceived risk, perceived quality, and satisfaction. Additionally, perceived risk positively influences perceived quality. However, perceived quality exhibits a negative relationship with satisfaction. Both impulse and planned behaviors significantly moderate the relationship, except for the value aesthetic attributes of fashion clothing and perceived risk for impulse buyers. This article contributes to the theoretical and practical implications.
Suggested Citation
Clare D’Souza & Winnie Wong & Nicole El Haber & Anne Renée Brouwer & Outi Niininen, 2024.
"Online impulse purchases versus planned purchases and the role of visual attributes,"
Journal of Global Fashion Marketing, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(4), pages 504-522, October.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:rgfmxx:v:15:y:2024:i:4:p:504-522
DOI: 10.1080/20932685.2024.2361884
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rgfmxx:v:15:y:2024:i:4:p:504-522. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rgfm .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.