IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rfiaxx/v22y2024i2p6-12.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Worse Things Than Losing: Underdogs Defining Likelihood of Success

Author

Listed:
  • Eric Patterson

Abstract

This essay is a preliminary argument intended to provoke just war scholars to think more carefully and deeply about the criterion of likelihood of success. This is particularly appropriate at this moment in time as Taiwan is on high alert as it faces China, and as we watch the determination of Ukraine to defend itself from Russian aggression. Since the writing of this essay, the 9 million people of the state of Israel faced the horrific assault by Hamas terrorists on October 7, 2023. If likelihood of success is prioritized over the primary jus ad bellum criteria, then many possible limited successes evaporate from creative strategy. Perhaps a better way of thinking about this is that we must be thoughtful in defining what we mean by “success.” Success need not be only immediate tactical or strategic victory, as tactical losses may result in strategic wins.

Suggested Citation

  • Eric Patterson, 2024. "Worse Things Than Losing: Underdogs Defining Likelihood of Success," The Review of Faith & International Affairs, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(2), pages 6-12, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:rfiaxx:v:22:y:2024:i:2:p:6-12
    DOI: 10.1080/15570274.2024.2335080
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/15570274.2024.2335080
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/15570274.2024.2335080?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rfiaxx:v:22:y:2024:i:2:p:6-12. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rfia20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.