IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/revape/v33y2006i109p483-495.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A political ecology of wildlife conservation in Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Samantha Jones

Abstract

This short review summarises research and key debates in the conservation and management of wildlife, biodiversity and valued environments in Africa. It is broadly grounded in a political ecology approach, and indicates the importance of considering ways in which power and meanings conferred on the landscape play out in the realm of conservation. The review highlights the paradigm shift that has occurred in thinking about African environments and shows how this has shaped approaches to conservation. It considers factors that influenced the origin of conservation initiatives in Africa, including the preservation of game for hunting and the establishment of national parks in the United States. The shift from an early fortress conservation model to later community conservation approaches is traced and a summary of the critique of community conservation with a analysis of the CAMPFIRE programme in Zimbabwe, is presented. More recently the conservation agenda seems to have turned towards transfrontier conservation. The conclusion cautions that despite the weight of critical analyses of community conservation, its abandonment would be somewhat premature and potentially detrimental to desirable conservation and development outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Samantha Jones, 2006. "A political ecology of wildlife conservation in Africa," Review of African Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(109), pages 483-495, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:revape:v:33:y:2006:i:109:p:483-495
    DOI: 10.1080/03056240601000911
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03056240601000911
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03056240601000911?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Muboko, Never & Bradshaw, Gavin J, 2018. "Towards Resolving Local Community and Protected Area Management Conflicts: Lessons from the Chitsa community and Gonarezhou National Park, Zimbabwe," International Journal of Development and Conflict, Gokhale Institute of Politics and Economics, vol. 8(2), pages 62-79.
    2. Nicoli Nattrass, 2021. "Differentiation in Economic Costs and Returns from Living with Wildlife in Namibian Community Conservancies," South African Journal of Economics, Economic Society of South Africa, vol. 89(2), pages 282-300, June.
    3. Calfucura, Enrique, 2018. "Governance, Land and Distribution: A Discussion on the Political Economy of Community-Based Conservation," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 18-26.
    4. Mackenzie, Catrina A., 2012. "Accruing benefit or loss from a protected area: Location matters," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 119-129.
    5. Ntuli, Herbert & Muchapondwa, Edwin & Okumu, Boscow, 2020. "Can local communities afford full control over wildlife conservation? The case of Zimbabwe," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 37(C).
    6. MacKenzie, Catrina A., 2018. "Risk, Reciprocity and Retribution: Choosing to Extract Resources From a Protected Area," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 314-323.
    7. Siyuan He & Lingfan Yang & Qingwen Min, 2020. "Community Participation in Nature Conservation: The Chinese Experience and Its Implication to National Park Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-17, June.
    8. B. Ikubolajeh Logan & Francis Y. Owusu & Ezekiel Kalipeni, 2012. "Introduction: Beyond the ‘post’ and revisionist discourses in African development: Exploring real solutions to Africa’s problems," Progress in Development Studies, , vol. 12(2-3), pages 93-98, July.
    9. Sharma, Amit & Messerli, Hannah & Lin, Michael S., 2023. "Land use regulations and small tourism enterprises," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    10. Orleans Mfune, 2014. "Managing common pool resources without state support: insights from Shisholeka community in Central Zambia," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 16(6), pages 1263-1280, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:revape:v:33:y:2006:i:109:p:483-495. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CREA20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.