IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/revape/v27y2000i85p407-425.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Maintaining corporate dominance after decolonization: the ‘first mover advantage’ of Shell‐BP in Nigeria

Author

Listed:
  • Jêdrzej Frynas
  • Matthias Beck
  • Kamel Mellahi

Abstract

Nigeria's oil industry came into being during colonial rule. Preferential treatment by British colonial authorities had given a British oil company — Shell — a virtual monopoly over oil exploration in the country and Shell has remained the dominant oil company in Nigeria. While there is substantial evidence to suggest that Shell‐BP established its dominant position in Nigeria with the support of British colonial officials, it was by no means clear that Shell would be able to maintain this advantageous position. Indeed, the historical record shows that both the Nigerian government and a number of competitors posed a potential threat to Shell's dominant position. The purpose of this article is to answer the question why Shell was able to maintain a position of dominance in Nigeria. It examines Nigeria's diversification and nationalisation policies from the late 1950s to‐date with the view of identifying the factors which allowed Shell to maintain its position vis‐à‐vis potential competitors. This investigation is based on the analysis of secondary sources as well as documents from the Public Record Office (PRO) in London and the BP Archive. In order to explain Shell's dominance in Nigeria, the article proposes to utilise the concept of a ‘first mover advantage’. On the most basic level, this concept suggests that pioneering firms are able to obtain positive economic profits as the consequence of early market entry, that means, profits in excess of the cost of capital. The article concludes that a micro‐theoretical analysis based on the idea of a ‘first mover advantage’, which explores the position of individual corporate entities within a political economy framework, provides a superior explanation of Shell's dominance in Nigeria as compared to conventional macro‐theoretical structuralist approaches.

Suggested Citation

  • Jêdrzej Frynas & Matthias Beck & Kamel Mellahi, 2000. "Maintaining corporate dominance after decolonization: the ‘first mover advantage’ of Shell‐BP in Nigeria," Review of African Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(85), pages 407-425.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:revape:v:27:y:2000:i:85:p:407-425
    DOI: 10.1080/03056240008704475
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03056240008704475
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03056240008704475?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Uwafiokun Idemudia & Uwem E. Ite, 2006. "Corporate–community relations in Nigeria's oil industry: challenges and imperatives," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(4), pages 194-206, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:revape:v:27:y:2000:i:85:p:407-425. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CREA20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.