IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/reroxx/v30y2017i1p416-438.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The accuracy of alternative stock valuation methods – the case of the Warsaw Stock Exchange

Author

Listed:
  • Błażej Prusak

Abstract

The main aim of this article is to examine the accuracy of different methods of share valuation used by Polish analysts in reports prepared in order to issue recommendations for companies listed on the Warsaw Stock Exchange. In the literature on the subject, the view which prevails is that the more sophisticated methods, i.e. those taking into account the discounting process, are characterised by higher valuation accuracy. However, the results of the present analysis show that Polish analysts achieve more accurate valuations using the market approach than the DCF model. Nevertheless, the highest level of accuracy is achieved by the target price, which in most cases is the value of the weighted average of valuations obtained via a market valuation and discounting methods. In terms of the multiples which are taken into account in this research, the highest accuracy is achieved with the use of EV/EBIT, although there are no statistically significant differences between the valuations calculated using this multiple and the results obtained with the P/E and EV/EBITDA multiples. Valuations prepared with the use of individual multiples usually generate greater errors compared to the DCF model and the market approach, which uses the weighted average of the valuations achieved with individual multiples.

Suggested Citation

  • Błażej Prusak, 2017. "The accuracy of alternative stock valuation methods – the case of the Warsaw Stock Exchange," Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(1), pages 416-438, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:reroxx:v:30:y:2017:i:1:p:416-438
    DOI: 10.1080/1331677X.2017.1305793
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/1331677X.2017.1305793
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/1331677X.2017.1305793?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:reroxx:v:30:y:2017:i:1:p:416-438. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rero .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.