IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/regstd/v44y2010i2p183-200.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Managing Infrastructural and Service Demands in New Economic Spaces: The New Territorial Politics of Collective Provision

Author

Listed:
  • Andrew Jonas
  • Aidan While
  • David Gibbs

Abstract

Jonas A. E. G., While A. H. and Gibbs D. C. Managing infrastructural and service demands in new economic spaces: the new territorial politics of collective provision, Regional Studies. Research on the geography of urban and regional economic development in the United States and Europe often emphasizes the contribution of supply-side entrepreneurial local policies to the development and competitiveness of new economic spaces (NES) in and around city-regions. Such policies include public-private partnerships and new forms of regional governance. As hitherto successful NES mature, a newer set of struggles has emerged in particular cities and regions having important clusters of new economic activities. These involve new demands for collective provision of infrastructure, workforce housing, and services. Using evidence from Greater Boston in Massachusetts, United States, and the Cambridge city-region in the UK, the paper proposes a set of concepts with which to investigate the new territorial politics of collective provision. This politics is an increasingly significant yet under-theorized aspect of the social regulation and competitiveness of NES. [image omitted] Jonas A. E. G., While A. H. et Gibbs D. C. Maitriser la demande d'equipement et de services dans les nouvelles espaces economiques: la nouvelle politique territoriale visant la prestation collective, Regional Studies. La recherche sur la geographie du developpement economique urbano-regional aux Etats-Unis et en Europe souligne souvent la contribution des politiques locales entrepreneuriales de l'offre au developpement et a la competitivite des nouvelles espaces economiques au sein et autour des cites-regions. De telles politiques incluent des partenariats publics-prives et de nouvelles formes de gouvernance regionale. Au fur et a mesure que les nouvelles espaces economiques reussies murissent, un nouvel ensemble de conflits a fait le jour dans certaines grandes villes et regions qui ont d'importantes grappes de nouvelles activites economiques. Celles-la comportent de nouvelles demandes de prestation d'equipement, de logement social et de services collective. A partir des donnees pour Greater Boston, aux E-U, et pour la cite-region de Cambridge, au R-U, cet article propose un ensemble de concepts a l'aide duquel on peut examiner la nouvelle politique territoriale de prestation collective. Cette politique est un aspect de plus en plus important, pourtant insuffisamment theorise, de la reglementation sociale et de la competitivite des nouvelles espaces economiques. Nouvelles espaces economiques Prestation collective Etat Etats-Unis Europe Jonas A. E. G., While A. H. und Gibbs D. C. Verwaltung der Nachfrage nach Infrastruktur und Dienstleistungen in neuen Wirtschaftsraumen: die neue Territorialpolitik der kollektiven Beschaffung, Regional Studies. Bei der Erforschung der Geografie der urbanen und regionalen Wirtschaftsentwicklung in den USA und Europa wird oft der Beitrag der lokalen Unternehmenspolitik auf der Angebotsseite zur Entwicklung und Wettbewerbsfahigkeit von neuen Wirtschaftsraumen in Stadtregionen und ihrer Umgebung betont. Beispiele hierfur sind offentlich-private Partnerschaften und neue Formen der Regionalregierung. Wahrend bisher erfolgreiche neue Wirtschaftsraume reifen, haben sich in bestimmten Stadten und Regionen, die uber wichtige Cluster neuer Wirtschaftstatigkeiten verfugen, neuere Arten von Bemuhungen herausgebildet. Hierzu gehort eine neue Nachfrage nach einer kollektiven Bereitstellung von Infrastruktur, Arbeitnehmer-Unterkunften und Dienstleistungen. Anhand von Belegen aus dem Grossraum Boston in den USA sowie aus der Stadtregion Cambridge in Grossbritannien schlagen wir in diesem Beitrag verschiedene Konzepte zur Untersuchung der neuen Territorialpolitik kollektiver Beschaffung vor. Diese Politik stellt einen immer wichtigeren, aber zu wenig theoretisierten Aspekt der gesellschaftlichen Regelung und Wettbewerbsfahigkeit von neuen Wirtschaftsraumen dar. Neue Wirtschaftsraume Kollektive Beschaffung Staat USA Europa Jonas A. E. G., While A. H. y Gibbs D. C. Gestion de las demandas de infraestructura y servicios en los nuevos espacios economicos: las nuevas politicas territoriales de dotacion colectiva, Regional Studies. En el estudio sobre geografia del desarrollo economico urbano y regional en los Estados Unidos y Europa se suele recalcar la contribucion de las politicas locales empresariales de suministro para el desarrollo y la competitividad de los nuevos espacios economicos en las regiones metropolitanas y alrededores. Estas politicas incluyen sociedades publicas-privadas y nuevas formas de gobierno regional. Mientras maduran los nuevos espacios economicos, hasta ahora con gran exito, se han desarrollado nuevos esfuerzos en determinadas ciudades y regiones que disponen de importantes aglomeraciones de nuevas actividades economicas. Esto implica nuevas demandas de una dotacion colectiva de infraestructura, viviendas para los trabajadores y servicios. Mediante los ejemplos del Greater Boston en los Estados Unidos y la region metropolitana de Cambridge en el Reino Unido, en este articulo proponemos una serie de conceptos con los que analizamos las nuevas politicas territoriales de dotacion colectiva. Estas politicas representan un aspecto cada vez mas importante, aunque todavia poco teorizado, de la regulacion social y la competitividad de los nuevos espacios economicos. Nuevos espacios economicos Dotacion colectiva El Estado EE.UU Europa

Suggested Citation

  • Andrew Jonas & Aidan While & David Gibbs, 2010. "Managing Infrastructural and Service Demands in New Economic Spaces: The New Territorial Politics of Collective Provision," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(2), pages 183-200.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:regstd:v:44:y:2010:i:2:p:183-200
    DOI: 10.1080/00343400802662666
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00343400802662666
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00343400802662666?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Scott, Allen J. (ed.), 2001. "Global City-Regions: Trends, Theory, Policy," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780198297994.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hall, Stephen & Foxon, Timothy J., 2014. "Values in the Smart Grid: The co-evolving political economy of smart distribution," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 600-609.
    2. Aidan While & David Gibbs & Andrew E G Jonas, 2013. "The Competition State, City-Regions, and the Territorial Politics of Growth Facilitation," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 45(10), pages 2379-2398, October.
    3. Gordon MacLeod, 2011. "Urban Politics Reconsidered," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 48(12), pages 2629-2660, September.
    4. Andrew E. G. Jonas & Andrew R. Goetz & Sutapa Bhattacharjee, 2014. "City-regionalism as a Politics of Collective Provision: Regional Transport Infrastructure in Denver, USA," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 51(11), pages 2444-2465, August.
    5. Jean-Paul D Addie, 2016. "On the road to the in-between city: Excavating peripheral urbanisation in Chicago’s ‘Crosstown Corridor’," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 48(5), pages 825-843, May.
    6. Rob Krueger & David Gibbs & Constance Carr, 2018. "Examining regional competitiveness and the pressures of rapid growth: An interpretive institutionalist account of policy responses in three city regions," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 36(6), pages 965-986, September.
    7. Julie Tian Miao, 2017. "Housing the knowledge economy in China: An examination of housing provision in support of science parks," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 54(6), pages 1426-1445, May.
    8. Peter O’Brien & Andy Pike, 2019. "‘Deal or no deal?’ Governing urban infrastructure funding and financing in the UK City Deals," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(7), pages 1448-1476, May.
    9. Henk-Jan Kooij, 2017. "Mediating Policy Competition Through Campus Development in Dutch Limburg," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 108(6), pages 869-878, December.
    10. Andrew EG Jonas & Andrew R Goetz & Sylvia Brady, 2019. "The global infrastructure public-private partnership and the extra-territorial politics of collective provision: The case of regional rail transit in Denver, USA," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(7), pages 1426-1447, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mace, Alan & Holman, Nancy & Paccoud, Antoine & Sundaresan, Jayaraj, 2015. "Coordinating density; working through conviction, suspicion and pragmatism," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 56768, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    2. Jennifer Robinson, 2011. "Cities in a World of Cities: The Comparative Gesture," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(1), pages 1-23, January.
    3. Bo Liu & Desheng Xue & Yiming Tan, 2019. "Deciphering the Manufacturing Production Space in Global City-Regions of Developing Countries—a Case of Pearl River Delta, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-26, December.
    4. John Parr, 2015. "The city and the region as contrasts in spatial organization," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 54(3), pages 797-817, May.
    5. HaeRan Shin & Quentin Stevens, 2013. "How Culture and Economy Meet in South Korea: The Politics of Cultural Economy in Culture-led Urban Regeneration," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(5), pages 1707-1723, September.
    6. Anthony Goerzen & Michael Sartor & Kristin Brandl & Stacey Fitzsimmons, 2023. "Widening the lens: Multilevel drivers of firm corporate social performance," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 54(1), pages 42-60, February.
    7. Vicente Romero de à vila Serrano, 2019. "The Intrametropolitan Geography of Knowledge-Intensive Business Services (KIBS): A Comparative Analysis of Six European and U.S. City-Regions," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 33(4), pages 279-295, November.
    8. Robert R. Hewitt, 2014. "Globalization and Landscape Architecture," SAGE Open, , vol. 4(1), pages 21582440135, February.
    9. René Véron, 2010. "Small Cities, Neoliberal Governance and Sustainable Development in the Global South: A Conceptual Framework and Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 2(9), pages 1-16, September.
    10. Michael Storper & Anthony J. Venables, 2004. "Buzz: face-to-face contact and the urban economy," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 4(4), pages 351-370, August.
    11. Michał Myck & Mateusz Najsztub, 2020. "Implications of the Polish 1999 administrative reform for regional socio‐economic development," Economics of Transition and Institutional Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(4), pages 559-579, October.
    12. Samira Oukarfi & Maurice Baslé, 2009. "Public-sector financial incentives for business relocation and effectiveness measures based on company profile and geographic zone," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 43(2), pages 509-526, June.
    13. Ludovic Halbert, 2008. "Examining the Mega-City-Region Hypothesis: Evidence from the Paris City-Region/Bassin parisien," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(8), pages 1147-1160.
    14. Walter J. Nicholls, 2011. "The Los Angeles School: Difference, Politics, City," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(1), pages 189-206, January.
    15. H.S. Geyer & H.S. Geyer & D. Du Plessis, 2015. "Primary Cities in Sub-Saharan Africa: Quasars, Loose Connections, and Black Holes," International Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(1-2), pages 39-51, May.
    16. Delgado, Mercedes & Porter, Michael E. & Stern, Scott, 2014. "Clusters, convergence, and economic performance," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(10), pages 1785-1799.
    17. Fulong Wu, 2020. "Adding new narratives to the urban imagination: An introduction to ‘New directions of urban studies in China’," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(3), pages 459-472, February.
    18. Rodrigo V Cardoso & Evert J Meijers, 2017. "The metropolitan name game: The pathways to place naming shaping metropolitan regions," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 49(3), pages 703-721, March.
    19. Jiangbo Bie & Martin de Jong & Ben Derudder, 2015. "Greater Pearl River Delta: Historical Evolution towards a Global City-Region," Journal of Urban Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(2), pages 103-123, April.
    20. Hui Li & Xue Huang & Qing Xu & Shuntao Wang & Wanqi Guo & Yan Liu & Yilin Huang & Junzhi Wang, 2023. "A New Approach to Evaluate the Sustainability of Ecological and Economic Systems in Megacity Clusters: A Case Study of the Guangdong–Hong Kong–Macau Bay Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-25, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:regstd:v:44:y:2010:i:2:p:183-200. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CRES20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.