IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/regstd/v42y2008i8p1147-1160.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Examining the Mega-City-Region Hypothesis: Evidence from the Paris City-Region/Bassin parisien

Author

Listed:
  • Ludovic Halbert

Abstract

Halbert L. Examining the mega-city-region hypothesis: evidence from the Paris city-region/Bassin parisien, Regional Studies. Four dimensions of the concept of polycentricity (morphological, functional, relational, and political polycentricity) are discussed based on the study of the Paris city-region/Bassin parisien system. The concentration of 'Abstract Production' workers in the Paris agglomeration and the fairly concentrated geography of firms' information flows (as measured by their telephone calls) prevent the formation of an enlarged polycentric mega-city-region. Three explanations are proposed based on the strategies of real estate developers, information-intensive firms and policy-makers. In conclusion, the paper tries to evaluate in the Paris city-region and French context whether a limited polycentricity at Bassin parisien level is prejudicial at different policy-relevant scales. [image omitted] Halbert L. Examen de l'hypothese relative a la mega ville-region a partir de l'exemple du Bassin parisien, Regional Studies. Cet article traite de quatre dimensions du concept de polycentricite (morphologique, fonctionnelle, relationnelle et politique) en s'appuyant sur l'etude relative au systeme ville-region de Paris/Bassin parisien. La concentration de travailleurs de production abstraite dans l'agglomeration parisienne et la concentration relativement importante de flux d'information d'entreprise (mesuree par les appels telephoniques) empechent la formation d'une mega ville-region polycentrique elargie. Trois explications sont proposees qui sont basees sur les strategies des promoteurs immobiliers, des entreprises basees sur l'information et des decideurs politiques. En conclusion, j'essaie d'evaluer la ville-region de Paris et le contexte francais afin de savoir si une polycentricite limitee au niveau du Bassin parisien est prejudiciable aux differentes echelles politiques pertinentes. Polycentricite Ville-region elargie Services avances aux enterprises Production abstraite Appels telephoniques des entreprises Paris/Ile-de-France/Bassin parisien Halbert L. Untersuchung der Hypothese der Megastadtregion: Belege aus der Stadtregion Paris bzw. dem Bassin parisien, Regional Studies. In diesem Beitrag werden anhand einer Studie des Bassin-parisien-Systems bzw. der Stadtregion von Paris vier Dimensionen der Konzepts der Polyzentrizitat (morphologische, funktionale, relationale und politische Polyzentrizitat) erortert. Die Konzentration von Arbeitern im Bereich der 'abstrakten Produktion' im Ballungsraum Paris und die recht konzentrierte Geografie der Informationsstrome von Firmen (gemessen anhand ihrer Telefonate) verhindern die Bildung einer erweiterten, polyzentrischen Megastadtregion. Ausgehend von den Strategien von Immobilienfirmen, informationsintensiven Firmen und politischen Entscheidungstragern werden drei mogliche Erklarungen erortert. Abschliessend versuche ich im Kontext von der Pariser Stadtregion und von Frankreich zu bewerten, ob sich eine begrenzte Polyzentrizitat auf der Ebene des Bassin parisien in verschiedenen, politisch relevanten Massstaben schadlich auswirken kann. Polyzentrizitat Erweiterte Stadtregion Wirtschaftsdienstleistungen Abstrakte Produktion Firmentelefonate Paris/Ile-de-France/Bassin parisien Halbert L. Analisis de la hipotesis de las regiones mega-ciudad: ejemplo de la region ciudad de Paris/Bassin parisien, Regional Studies. En este articulo se abordan cuatro dimensiones del concepto de policentralidad (morfologica, funcional, relacional y politica) a partir de un estudio de la ciudad region de Paris y el sistema Bassin parisien. La concentracion de los trabajadores en el sector de la 'produccion abstracta' en la aglomeracion de Paris y la geografia bastante concentrada de los flujos de informacion de las empresas (medidas segun las llamadas telefonicas) impiden la creacion de una region mega-ciudad policentrica mas amplia. Se proponen tres explicaciones en funcion de las estrategias de promotores inmobiliarios, las empresas con alto nivel de informacion y los responsables politicos. Para terminar, intento evaluar si una policentralidad a nivel del Bassin parisien en la ciudad-region de Paris y en un contexto frances es perjudicial en diferentes escalas relevantes a la politica. Policentralidad Region ciudad ampliada Servicios avanzados de productores Produccion abstracta Llamadas telefonicas de empresas Paris/Ile-de-France/Bassin parisien

Suggested Citation

  • Ludovic Halbert, 2008. "Examining the Mega-City-Region Hypothesis: Evidence from the Paris City-Region/Bassin parisien," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(8), pages 1147-1160.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:regstd:v:42:y:2008:i:8:p:1147-1160
    DOI: 10.1080/00343400701861328
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00343400701861328
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00343400701861328?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Scott, Allen J. (ed.), 2001. "Global City-Regions: Trends, Theory, Policy," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780198297994.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Antoine Guironnet & Katia Attuyer & Ludovic Halbert, 2016. "Building cities on financial assets: The financialisation of property markets and its implications for city governments in the Paris city-region," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(7), pages 1442-1464, May.
    2. Alain Thierstein & Stefan Lüthi, 2012. "Interlocking Firm Networks in the German Knowledge Economy: The Case of the Emerging Mega-city Region of Munich," Chapters, in: Marina van Geenhuizen & Peter Nijkamp (ed.), Creative Knowledge Cities, chapter 13, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    3. Xingjian Liu & Ben Derudder & Mingshu Wang, 2018. "Polycentric urban development in China: A multi-scale analysis," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 45(5), pages 953-972, September.
    4. Jiejing Wang, 2020. "Urban government capacity and economic performance: An analysis of Chinese cities," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 52(5), pages 981-1004, August.
    5. Maria Andrakakou & Carsten Keßler, 2022. "Investigating configurational and active centralities: The example of metropolitan Copenhagen," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 49(7), pages 1949-1966, September.
    6. Divya Leducq & Christophe Demaziere & Étienne Bou Abdo & Priscilla Ananian, 2022. "Digital nomads and coworking spaces," Post-Print hal-03858510, HAL.
    7. Dong Lin & Andrew Allan & Jianqiang Cui, 2016. "Exploring Differences in Commuting Behaviour among Various Income Groups during Polycentric Urban Development in China: New Evidence and Its Implications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-17, November.
    8. Reades, Jonathan & Smith, Duncan, 2014. "Mapping the ‘space of flows’: the geography of global business telecommunications and employment specialization in the London mega-city-region," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 55812, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Constance Carr & Markus Hesse, 2020. "When Alphabet Inc. Plans Toronto’s Waterfront: New Post-Political Modes of Urban Governance," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(1), pages 69-83.
    2. Mace, Alan & Holman, Nancy & Paccoud, Antoine & Sundaresan, Jayaraj, 2015. "Coordinating density; working through conviction, suspicion and pragmatism," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 56768, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    3. Andrés Rodríguez-Pose & Riccardo Crescenzi, 2008. "Mountains in a flat world: why proximity still matters for the location of economic activity," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 1(3), pages 371-388.
    4. Jennifer Robinson, 2011. "Cities in a World of Cities: The Comparative Gesture," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(1), pages 1-23, January.
    5. Bo Liu & Desheng Xue & Yiming Tan, 2019. "Deciphering the Manufacturing Production Space in Global City-Regions of Developing Countries—a Case of Pearl River Delta, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-26, December.
    6. Alain Thierstein & Stefan Lüthi, 2012. "Interlocking Firm Networks in the German Knowledge Economy: The Case of the Emerging Mega-city Region of Munich," Chapters, in: Marina van Geenhuizen & Peter Nijkamp (ed.), Creative Knowledge Cities, chapter 13, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    7. John Parr, 2015. "The city and the region as contrasts in spatial organization," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 54(3), pages 797-817, May.
    8. HaeRan Shin & Quentin Stevens, 2013. "How Culture and Economy Meet in South Korea: The Politics of Cultural Economy in Culture-led Urban Regeneration," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(5), pages 1707-1723, September.
    9. Evert Meijers & Martijn Burger & Roberto Camagni & Roberta Capello & Andrea Caragliu, 2016. "Static vs. dynamic agglomeration economies. Spatial context and structural evolution behind urban growth," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 95(1), pages 133-158, March.
    10. Anthony Goerzen & Michael Sartor & Kristin Brandl & Stacey Fitzsimmons, 2023. "Widening the lens: Multilevel drivers of firm corporate social performance," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 54(1), pages 42-60, February.
    11. Vicente Romero de à vila Serrano, 2019. "The Intrametropolitan Geography of Knowledge-Intensive Business Services (KIBS): A Comparative Analysis of Six European and U.S. City-Regions," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 33(4), pages 279-295, November.
    12. Michael Neuman & Angela Hull, 2009. "The Futures of the City Region," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(6), pages 777-787.
    13. Joe Painter, 2013. "Regional Biopolitics," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(8), pages 1235-1248, September.
    14. Peter Karl Kresl (ed.), 2010. "Economic Strategies for Mature Industrial Economies," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 14116, March.
    15. Robert R. Hewitt, 2014. "Globalization and Landscape Architecture," SAGE Open, , vol. 4(1), pages 21582440135, February.
    16. René Véron, 2010. "Small Cities, Neoliberal Governance and Sustainable Development in the Global South: A Conceptual Framework and Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 2(9), pages 1-16, September.
    17. Michael Storper & Anthony J. Venables, 2004. "Buzz: face-to-face contact and the urban economy," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 4(4), pages 351-370, August.
    18. Mathew Johnson & Miguel Martínez Lucio & Stephen Mustchin & Damian Grimshaw & Jo Cartwright & Jenny K. Rodriguez & Tony Dundon, 2023. "City regions and decent work: Politics, pluralism and policy making in Greater Manchester," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 41(3), pages 504-522, May.
    19. Adrian Pabst & Roberto Scazzieri, 2012. "The political economy of civil society," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 337-356, December.
    20. Kesidou, Effie & Szirmai, Adam, 2008. "Local Knowledge Spillovers, Innovation and Economic Performance in Developing Countries: A discussion of alternative specifications," MERIT Working Papers 2008-033, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:regstd:v:42:y:2008:i:8:p:1147-1160. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CRES20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.