IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/regstd/v40y2006i6p679-689.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Devolution, sustainability and GDP convergence: Is the Welsh agenda achievable?

Author

Listed:
  • Lynn Mainwaring
  • Richard Jones
  • David Blackaby

Abstract

Mainwaring L., Jones R. and Blackaby D. (2006) Devolution, sustainability and GDP convergence: is the Welsh agenda achievable?, Regional Studies 40, 679-689. The Welsh Assembly Government has a constitutional duty to promote sustainable development. The devolution settlement does not, however, empower the Assembly to deviate from UK tax rates, while the Assembly Government has itself adopted ambitious gross domestic product growth targets. Here, the paper considers notions of sustainability and it attempts to place the Welsh agenda within those conceptual approaches. It then discusses the significance of the absence of tax variation as an instrument for generating relative sustainability gains. In particular, it examines the regional relevance of the 'double-dividend' argument that governments can substitute efficient environmental taxes for inefficient labour-market taxes. Finally, it considers the implications for sustainability of promoting quality of life, or happiness, achievement above the gross domestic product as the main goal of policy. The lessons drawn should be of relevance to other semi-autonomous regions. Mainwaring L., Jones R. et Blackaby D. (2006) La regionalisation, le developpement durable et la convergence du PIB: le programme gallois, est-il realisable?, Regional Studies 40, 679-689. L'Assemblee galloise se voit attribuer en droit constitutionnel la promotion du developpement durable. Neanmoins, l'accord sur la regionalisation ne donne pas a l'Assemblee le droit de s'ecarter des taux d'imposition en vigueur au R-U, alors que l'Assemblee elle-meme a vise des objectifs ambitieux pour ce qui est du PIB. Cet article cherche a examiner des notions de developpement durable et a relativiser le programme gallois par rapport a ces approches conceptuelles. Il s'ensuit une discussion de l'importance du manque de variation fiscale comme outil qui engendre des gains relatifs dus au developpement durable. En particulier, on examine l'importance regionale de l'argument en faveur du 'double dividende', a savoir les gouvernements peuvent substituer des taxes ecologiques efficaces au taxes du travail inefficaces. Pour finir, on considere les retombees pour le developpement durable de la promotion de la qualite de la vie, ou du bonheur, par-dessus le PIB comme but principal de la politique. Les lecons ainsi tirees devraient presenter de l'interet pour d'autres regions semiautonomes. Pays de Galles Regionalisation Developpement durable Double-dividende Bonheur Mainwaring L., Jones R. und Blackaby D. (2006) Machtubertragung, Nachhaltigkeit und Konvergenz des Bruttoinlandsprodukts: ist das walisische Programm durchfuhrbar?, Regional Studies 40, 679-689. Die Regierung der Parlamentarischen Versammlung von Wales hat die in der Verfassung verankerte Pflicht, nachhaltige Entwicklung zu fordern. Das Ubereinkommen der Machtubertragung befahigt die parlamentarische Versammlung jedoch nicht, von den Steuersatzen des UK abzuweichen, obschon die Regierung der parlamentarischen Versammlung sich selber ehrgeizige Wachstumsziele fur das Bruttoinlandsprodukt gesetzt hat. Der vorliegende Aufsatz geht auf Vorstellungen der Nachhaltigkeit ein und versucht, das walisische Programm in diesen begrifflichen Ansatz einzuordnen. Dann folgt eine Diskussion der Bedeutung fehlender Steuerunterschiede als Instrument zur Schaffung einer verhaltnismassigen Zunahme der Nachhaltigkeit. Insbesondere wird die regionale Zunahme des Argumentes der 'doppelten Dividende' untersucht, das Regierungen gestattet, unwirksame Arbeitsmarktsteuern durch effiziente Umweltsteuern zu ersetzen. Abschliessend werden die Implikationen fur die Nachhaltigkeit der Forderung der Lebensqualitat, bz.w.des Erreichens einer Zufriedenheit uber das Bruttosozialprodukt hinaus als Hauptziel der Bestrebungen besprochen. Wales Machtubertragung nachhaltige Entwicklung doppelte Dividende Zufriedenheit Mainwaring L., Jones R. y Blackaby D. (2006) Transferencia de competencias, sostenibilidad y convergencia del PIB: ¿Se puede alcanzar el programa de Gales?, Regional Studies 40, 679-689. El Gobierno de la Asamblea de Gales tiene el deber constitucional de fomentar el desarrollo sostenible. Sin embargo, la transferencia de competencias no implica que la Asamblea este capacitada para desviarse del tipo de gravamen que se aplica en el Reino Unido, y al mismo tiempo el Gobierno de Gales ha adoptado ambiciosos objetivos de crecimiento del PIB. En este documento consideramos las nociones de sostenibilidad e intentamos ubicar la agenda de Gales en estos planteamientos conceptuales. Asimismo analizamos en que medida es importante la ausencia de una variacion fiscal como instrumento para generar beneficios relativos de sostenibilidad. En concreto, examinarmos la relevancia regional del argumento de 'doble dividendo' segun el cual los gobiernos pueden sustituir impuestos para el mercado laboral por impuestos eficaces para el medio ambiente. Para terminar, examinamos las implicaciones de la sostenibilidad en el fomento, por encima del PIB, de la calidad de vida o la felicidad como el objetivo principal de la politica. Las ensenanzas extraidas deberian ser importantes para otras regiones semiautonomas. Gales Transferencia de competencias Desarrollo sostenible Dividendo doble Felicidad

Suggested Citation

  • Lynn Mainwaring & Richard Jones & David Blackaby, 2006. "Devolution, sustainability and GDP convergence: Is the Welsh agenda achievable?," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(6), pages 679-689.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:regstd:v:40:y:2006:i:6:p:679-689
    DOI: 10.1080/00343400600868994
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00343400600868994
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00343400600868994?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lawrence H. Goulder, 1998. "Environmental Policy Making in a Second-Best Setting," Journal of Applied Economics, Universidad del CEMA, vol. 1, pages 279-328, November.
    2. Morgenstern, Richard D. & Pizer, William A. & Shih, Jhih-Shyang, 2002. "Jobs Versus the Environment: An Industry-Level Perspective," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 43(3), pages 412-436, May.
    3. Adam B. Jaffe et al., 1995. "Environmental Regulation and the Competitiveness of U.S. Manufacturing: What Does the Evidence Tell Us?," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 33(1), pages 132-163, March.
    4. Drusilla K. Brown, 2001. "Labor Standards: Where Do They Belong on the International Trade Agenda?," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 15(3), pages 89-112, Summer.
    5. Bruno S. Frey & Alois Stutzer, 2002. "What Can Economists Learn from Happiness Research?," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 40(2), pages 402-435, June.
    6. Clark, Andrew E. & Oswald, Andrew J., 1996. "Satisfaction and comparison income," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(3), pages 359-381, September.
    7. Neumayer, Eric, 2000. "On the methodology of ISEW, GPI and related measures: some constructive suggestions and some doubt on the 'threshold' hypothesis," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 347-361, September.
    8. Lintott, John, 1998. "Beyond the economics of more: the place of consumption in ecological economics," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 25(3), pages 239-248, June.
    9. Sankar, . Ulaganathan (ed.), 2001. "Environmental Economics," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780195659139.
    10. Hartwick, John M, 1977. "Intergenerational Equity and the Investing of Rents from Exhaustible Resources," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 67(5), pages 972-974, December.
    11. Frank, Robert H, 1997. "The Frame of Reference as a Public Good," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 107(445), pages 1832-1847, November.
    12. D. Gibbs, 1998. "Regional development agencies and sustainable development," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(4), pages 365-368.
    13. Karen Palmer & Wallace E. Oates & Paul R. Portney & Karen Palmer & Wallace E. Oates & Paul R. Portney, 2004. "Tightening Environmental Standards: The Benefit-Cost or the No-Cost Paradigm?," Chapters, in: Environmental Policy and Fiscal Federalism, chapter 3, pages 53-66, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    14. Tietenberg, T H, 1990. "Economic Instruments for Environmental Regulation," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 6(1), pages 17-33, Spring.
    15. Easterlin, Richard A., 1995. "Will raising the incomes of all increase the happiness of all?," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 27(1), pages 35-47, June.
    16. Revesz, Richard L. & Stavins, Robert N., 2007. "Environmental Law," Handbook of Law and Economics, in: A. Mitchell Polinsky & Steven Shavell (ed.), Handbook of Law and Economics, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 8, pages 499-589, Elsevier.
    17. Pearce, David W. & Atkinson, Giles D., 1993. "Capital theory and the measurement of sustainable development: an indicator of "weak" sustainability," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 8(2), pages 103-108, October.
    18. Tony Jackson, 2001. "Environmental Taxation: A New Tool for Local Planning?," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(1), pages 80-85.
    19. Mainwaring, Lynn, 2001. "Environmental values and the frame of reference," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 391-402, September.
    20. Lawrence H. Goulder, 1998. "Environmental Policy Making in a Second-Best Setting," Journal of Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 1(2), pages 279-328, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Graham Haughton & Kevin Morgan, 2008. "Editorial: Sustainable Regions," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(9), pages 1219-1222.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Drakopoulos, Stavros A., 2008. "The Concept Of Comparison Income: An Historical Perspective," MPRA Paper 8713, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Stutzer, Alois, 2004. "The role of income aspirations in individual happiness," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 54(1), pages 89-109, May.
    3. Stavros Drakopoulos, 2008. "The paradox of happiness: towards an alternative explanation," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 9(2), pages 303-315, June.
    4. Ravallion, Martin & Lokshin, Michael, 2010. "Who cares about relative deprivation?," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 73(2), pages 171-185, February.
    5. David G. Blanchflower & Andrew J. Oswald, 2004. "Money, Sex and Happiness: An Empirical Study," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 106(3), pages 393-415, October.
    6. Benno Torgler & Markus Schaffner & Bruno S. Frey & Sascha L. Schmidt, 2008. "Looking Awkward When Winning and Foolish When Losing: Inequity Aversion and Performance in the Field," CREMA Working Paper Series 2008-11, Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA).
    7. Giuseppe Munda, 2014. "On the Use of Shadow Prices for Sustainable Well-Being Measurement," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 118(2), pages 911-918, September.
    8. Edsel Beja Jr., 2013. "Subjective Well-Being Approach to the Valuation of International Development: Evidence for the Millennium Development Goals," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 111(1), pages 141-159, March.
    9. Benno Torgler & Markus Schaffner & Bruno S. Frey & Sascha L. Schmidt & Uwe Dulleck, 2008. "Inequality Aversion and Performance in and on the Field," CREMA Working Paper Series 2008-18, Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA).
    10. Beegle, Kathleen & Himelein, Kristen & Ravallion, Martin, 2012. "Frame-of-reference bias in subjective welfare," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 81(2), pages 556-570.
    11. Mainwaring, Lynn, 2001. "Environmental values and the frame of reference," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 391-402, September.
    12. Mentzakis, Emmanouil & Moro, Mirko, 2009. "The poor, the rich and the happy: Exploring the link between income and subjective well-being," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 147-158, January.
    13. Vendrik, Maarten C.M. & Woltjer, Geert B., 2007. "Happiness and loss aversion: Is utility concave or convex in relative income?," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(7-8), pages 1423-1448, August.
    14. Blanchflower, David G. & Oswald, Andrew J., 2004. "Well-being over time in Britain and the USA," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(7-8), pages 1359-1386, July.
    15. Gabriel Leite Mota, 2022. "Unsatisfying ordinalism: The breach through which happiness (re)entered economics," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 14(3), pages 513-528, June.
    16. Hajdu, Tamás & Hajdu, Gábor, 2011. "A hasznosság és a relatív jövedelem kapcsolatának vizsgálata magyar adatok segítségével [Examining the relation of utility and relative income using Hungarian data]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(1), pages 56-73.
    17. Stavins, Robert & Hahn, Robert & Cavanagh, Sheila, 2001. "National Environmental Policy During the Clinton Years," RFF Working Paper Series dp-01-38, Resources for the Future.
    18. Winston Harrington & Richard D. Morgenstern & Peter Nelson, 2000. "On the accuracy of regulatory cost estimates," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 19(2), pages 297-322.
    19. Benno Torgler & Sascha L. Schmidt & Bruno S. Frey, 2006. "The Power of Positional Concerns: A Panel Analysis," CREMA Working Paper Series 2006-19, Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA).
    20. Stefan Ambec & Paul Lanoie, 2007. "When and Why Does It Pay To Be Green?," CIRANO Working Papers 2007s-20, CIRANO.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:regstd:v:40:y:2006:i:6:p:679-689. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CRES20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.