Author
Abstract
Blazek J. and Vozab J. (2006) Ex-ante evaluation in the new Member States: the case of the Czech Republic, Regional Studies 40, 237-248. The paper gives a critical analysis of evaluation culture in one of the new Member States of the European Union: the Czech Republic. It examines the experience of drafting the first generation of programming documents for the EU Cohesion policy and of ex-ante evaluation, focusing on the National Development Plan (NDP), which is the basic strategic document for the Republic, around which programmes are framed. It considers the nature of the Czech support programmes, and the procedures and organization of the ex-ante evaluation of the NDP. It investigates the main weaknesses and benefits arising from this evaluation, including methodological, organizational and strategic problems. Finally, it draws implications for the next generation of programmes. Ex-ante evaluation Programming documents Implementation structures Czech Republic Blazek J. et Vozab J. (2006) L'evaluation ex-ante dans les nouveaux pays-membres: etude de cas de la Republique tcheque, Regional Studies 40, 237-248. L'article cherche a fournir une analyse critique de la culture d'evaluation dans un des nouveaux pays-membres de l'Union europeenne - la Republique tcheque. Il examine l'experience de la redaction des documents de programmation de premiere generation de la politique de cohesion de l'UE, et de l'evaluation ex-ante, portant sur le Plan de developpement national (PDN) qui constitue le document strategique de base pour la Republique et le point de mire de tout programme. On examine les caracteristiques des programmes de soutien tcheques, et les demarches et l'organisation de l'evaluation ex-ante du PDN. On examine les principaux atouts et inconvenients qui decoulent de ce cette evaluation, y compris des problemes methodologiques, organisationnels et strategiques. Pour conclure, on en tire les lecons pour ce qui est de la prochaine generation de programmes. Evaluation ex-ante Documents de programmation Structures de mise en oeuvre Republique tcheque Blazek J. und Vozab J. (2006) Ex-ante Evaluierung in neuen Mitgliedstaaten: der Fall der tschechischen Republik, Regional Studies 40, 237-248. Dieser Aufsatz legt eine kritische Analyse der Evaluierungskultur in einem der neuen Mitgliedstaaten der Europaischen Union vor - der tschechischen Republik. Er untersucht die Erfahrung des Entwerfens der ersten Generation der Programmdokumente fur die Kohasionspolitik der EU, und der ex-ante-Evaluierung, wobei er sich auf den staatlichen Entwicklungsplan (National Development Plan = NDP) konzentriert, der das strategische Kerndokument der Republik darstellt, der von weiteren Programmen umrahmt wird. Er berucksichtigt die Beschaffenheit der tschechischen Unterstutzungsprogramme, sowie Verfahren und Organisation der ex-ante-Evaluierung des NDP. Zusatzlich untersucht er die Hauptschwachen und-nutzen, die sich aus dieser Evaluierung ergeben, einschliesslich methodologischer, organisatorischer und strategischer Probleme. Abschliessend zieht er Schlusse fur die nachste Programmgeneration. Ex-ante-Evaluierung Programmdokumente Implementierungsstrukturen Tschechische Republik Blazek J. y Vozab J. (2006) Evaluacion ex-ante en los nuevos Estados Miembros: el caso de la Republica Checa, Regional Studies 40, 237-248. En este documento analizamos desde un punto de vista critico la cultura de evaluacion en uno de los nuevos Estados Miembros de la Union Europea: la Republica Checa. Examinamos la experiencia de preparar la primera generacion de documentos de programacion para la politica de cohesion de la UE y la evaluacion tipo ex-ante (previa), centrandonos en el Plan de Desarrollo Nacional (NDP) que constituye el documento basico y estrategico, desde el que se elaboran los programas, para la Republica Checa. Tenemos en cuenta la naturaleza de los programas de apoyo del pais y los procedimientos y la organizacion de la evaluacion ex-ante del NDP. Investigamos las flaquezas y los beneficios principales que surgen de esta evaluacion, incluyendo los problemas de tipo metodologico, organizativo y estrategico. Para terminar resaltamos que implicaciones tendra la siguiente generacion de programas. Evaluacion ex-ante Documentos de programacion Estructuras de aplicacion Republica Checa
Suggested Citation
Jiri Blazek & Jan Vozab, 2006.
"Ex-ante evaluation in the new member states: The case of the Czech Republic,"
Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(2), pages 237-248.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:regstd:v:40:y:2006:i:2:p:237-248
DOI: 10.1080/00343400600600603
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Citations
Citations are extracted by the
CitEc Project, subscribe to its
RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Theesfeld, Insa & Schleyer, Christian & Callois, Jean-Marc & Aznar, Olivier, 2008.
"Ex-ante Policy Assessment from an Institutional Perspective. A Procedure for Institutional Compatibility Assessment (PICA),"
Institutional Change in Agriculture and Natural Resources Discussion Papers
6112, Humboldt University Berlin, Department of Agricultural Economics.
- Schleyer, Christian & Theesfeld, Insa, 2011.
"Agrar- und Umweltpolitiken aus institutioneller Sicht: eine ex-ante Methode zur Politikbewertung,"
Journal of International Agricultural Trade and Development,
Journal of International Agricultural Trade and Development, vol. 60(3).
- Schleyer, Christian & Theesfeld, Insa, 2011.
"Agrar- und Umweltpolitiken aus institutioneller Sicht: eine ex-ante Methode zur Politikbewertung,"
German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 60(03), pages 1-14, August.
- Theesfeld, Insa & Schleyer, Christian & Callois, Jean-Marc & Aznar, Olivier, 2008.
"Ex-ante Policy Assessment of Agricultural, Environmental, and Rural Policies from an Institutional Perspective: The Procedure for Institutional Compatibility Assessment,"
2008 International Congress, August 26-29, 2008, Ghent, Belgium
43646, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:regstd:v:40:y:2006:i:2:p:237-248. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CRES20 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.