IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/regstd/v35y2001i8p673-688.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Initial Impacts of Community Economic Development Initiatives in the Yorkshire and Humber Structural Funds Programme

Author

Listed:
  • H. W. Armstrong
  • B. Kehrer
  • P. Wells

Abstract

This paper presents the evidence of the initial beneficial effects of Community Economic Development (CED) initiatives in Yorkshire and the Humber. The evidence is drawn from survey work undertaken as part of the formal evaluation of the region's 1994-99 Structural Funds Objective 2 programme. Previous research on CED has tended to focus on longer-term benefits. This paper, however, concentrates on the neglected issue of the immediate economic impacts of CED. These will eventually be superseded by capacity building and community linking effects. In the meanwhile, however, given the very recent (late 1994) insertion of CED into Structural Funds programmes in the UK, they represent the principal existing quantifiable impacts. The paper shows that the preliminary impacts are not only important in their own right, but also have implications for the effective longer-term targeting of CED on its designated communities. Cet article cherche a presenter des preuves des premiers impacts favorables des actions prioritaires en faveur du developpement economique d'initiative locale dans le Yorkshire et le Humberside. Les preuves sont puisees dans une enquete effectuee comme partie integrante de l'evaluation officielle du programme de la region lancesous l'egide de l'Objectif 2 du Fonds Structurel pour la periode de 1994 a 1999. Desrecherches anterieures sur le developpement economique d'initiative locale ont eu tendance a focaliser sur les avantages a plus long terme. Cet article porte plutot sur la question souvent negligee des impacts economiques immediats du developpement economique d'initiative locale. A terme, ces impacts feront place a des effets relatifs a la capacite a construire et aux liens communautaires. Entretemps, etant donne l'integration tres recente au Royaume-Uni (fin 1994) du developpement economique d'initiative locale dans les programmes qui remplissent les conditions requises pour beneficier du Fonds Structurel, ils representent les principaux impacts disponibles a evaluer avec precision. L'article montre que les premiers impacts sont non seulement importants en soi, mais aussi risquent d'avoir des consequences sur le ciblage efficace a plus long terme du developpement economique d'initiative locale pour ce qui est des communautes classees. Dieser Aufsatz stellt Beweise der anfanglich vorteilhaften Auswirkungen gemeinschaftlicher Wirtschaftsentwicklungsinitiativen (Community economic development - CED) in Yorkshire und der Humberregion vor. Die Beweise gehen auf Gutachterarbeiten zuruck, die als Teil der formalen Bewertung des Strukturfondsprogramms, Objekiv 2, der Region fur den Zeitraum 1975-1999 durchgefuhrt wurden. Fruhere Forschungsarbeiten uber CED beschaftigten sich meist hauptsachlich mit langerfristigen Unterstutzungszahlungen. Dieser Aufsatz wendet sich jedoch vorallem der vernachlassigten Frage der unmittelbaren wirtschaflichen Auswirkungen der CED zu. Im Laufe der Zeit werden sie von Kapazitatsaufbau und gemeinschaftsverbindende Wirkungen abgelost werden. Angesichts der erst kurzlich (Ende 1994) erfolgten Einbeziehung der CED in Strukturfondsprogramme des UK stellen sie vorlaufig aber die wichtigsten bestehenden quantifizierbaren Auswirkungen dar. Der Aufsatz zeigt, dass vorlaufige Auswirkungen nicht nur an sich von Bedeutung sind, sondern auch Implikationen fur wirksame, langerfristige Zielsetzung der CED fur die ihnen bestimmten Gemeinschaften haben.

Suggested Citation

  • H. W. Armstrong & B. Kehrer & P. Wells, 2001. "Initial Impacts of Community Economic Development Initiatives in the Yorkshire and Humber Structural Funds Programme," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(8), pages 673-688.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:regstd:v:35:y:2001:i:8:p:673-688
    DOI: 10.1080/00343400120084
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00343400120084
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00343400120084?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John Bachtler & Sandra Taylor, 1996. "Regional Development Strategies in Objective 2 Regions: A Comparative Assessment," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(8), pages 723-732.
    2. Peter Lee, 1999. "Where are the socially excluded? Continuing debates in the identification of poor neighbourhoods," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(5), pages 483-486.
    3. A. E. Green, 1997. "Exclusion, Unemployment and Non-employment," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(5), pages 505-520.
    4. C Connolly & M Chisholm, 1999. "The Use of Indicators for Targeting Public Expenditure: The Index of Local Deprivation," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 17(4), pages 463-482, August.
    5. A. E. Green, 1999. "Insights into unemployment and non-employment in Europe using alternative measures," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(5), pages 453-464.
    6. Paul F. Whiteley (ed.), 1998. "Economic Policy," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, volume 0, number 996.
    7. Machin, Stephen, 1998. "Recent shifts in wage inequality and the wage returns to education in Britain," National Institute Economic Review, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, vol. 166, pages 87-96, October.
    8. Machin, Stephen, 1998. "Recent shifts in wage inequality and the wage returns to education in Britain," National Institute Economic Review, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, vol. 166, pages 87-96, October.
    9. Machin, Stephen, 1996. "Wage Inequality in the UK," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 12(1), pages 47-64, Spring.
    10. Graham Haughton, 1998. "Principles And Practice Of Community Economic Development," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(9), pages 872-877.
    11. Wren, Colin & Taylor, Jim, 1999. "Industrial Restructuring and Regional Policy," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 51(3), pages 487-516, July.
    12. Kevin Morgan, 1997. "The Learning Region: Institutions, Innovation and Regional Renewal," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(5), pages 491-503.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hooton, Christopher Alex, 2019. "The application of micro-geographic economic analysis in urban policy evaluation," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 125-135.
    2. Gore, Tony & Wells, Peter, 2009. "Governance and evaluation: The case of EU regional policy horizontal priorities," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 158-167, May.
    3. Huasheng Zhu & Ruobin Liu & Bo Chen, 2023. "The Rise of Specialized and Innovative Little Giant Enterprises under China’s ‘Dual Circulation’ Development Pattern: An Analysis of Spatial Patterns and Determinants," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-26, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Puhani Patrick A., 2008. "Transatlantic Differences in Labour Markets: Changes in Wage and Non-Employment Structures in the 1980s and the 1990s," German Economic Review, De Gruyter, vol. 9(3), pages 312-338, August.
    2. Jayasri Dutta & James Sefton & Martin Weale, 1999. "Education and public policy," Fiscal Studies, Institute for Fiscal Studies, vol. 20(4), pages 351-386, December.
    3. Blanden, Jo & Goodman, Alissa & Gregg, Paul & Machin, Stephen, 2002. "Changes in intergenerational mobility in Britain," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 19507, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    4. Cardoso, Ana Rute, 2004. "Wage Mobility: Do Institutions Make a Difference? A Replication Study Comparing Portugal and the UK," IZA Discussion Papers 1086, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    5. Stephen Machin, 2024. "Real wages, inequality and living standards," CEP Election Analysis Papers 066, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    6. Taylor, Karl & Driffield, Nigel, 2005. "Wage inequality and the role of multinationals: evidence from UK panel data," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 12(2), pages 223-249, April.
    7. Weber, Andrea, 2002. "State Dependence and Wage Dynamics: A Heterogeneous Markov Chain Model for Wage Mobility in Austria," Economics Series 114, Institute for Advanced Studies.
    8. Monastiriotis, Vassilis, 2000. "Inter- And Intra-Regional Wage Inequalities In The Uk: An Examination Of The Sources Of Uk Wage Inequalities And Their Evolution," ERSA conference papers ersa00p228, European Regional Science Association.
    9. Cardoso, Ana Rute, 2004. "Jobs for Young University Graduates: Is It Worth Having a Degree?," IZA Discussion Papers 1311, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    10. Hofer, Helmut & Weber, Andrea, 2002. "Wage mobility in Austria 1986-1996," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 9(4), pages 563-577, September.
    11. Puhani, Patrick A., 2003. "A Test of the 'Krugman Hypothesis' for the United States, Britain, and Western Germany," ZEW Discussion Papers 03-18, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    12. Thanos Fragkandreas, 2022. "Three Decades of Research on Innovation and Inequality: Causal Scenarios, Explanatory Factors, and Suggestions," Working Papers 60, Birkbeck Centre for Innovation Management Research, revised Feb 2022.
    13. David J. Brooksbank & David G. Pickernell, 1999. "Regional Competitiveness Indicators," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 13(4), pages 310-326, February.
    14. Cardoso, Ana Rute, 2006. "Wage mobility: do institutions make a difference?," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 13(3), pages 387-404, June.
    15. Christina Beatty & Steve Fothergill, 2023. "The persistence of hidden unemployment among incapacity claimants in large parts of Britain," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 38(1), pages 42-60, February.
    16. repec:bla:germec:v:9:y:2008:i::p:312-338 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Blanden, Jo, 2013. "Cross-national rankings of intergenerational mobility: a comparison of approaches from economics and sociology," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 59310, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    18. H.W. Armstrong & B. Kehrer & P. Wells & A.M. Wood, 2002. "The Evaluation of Community Economic Development Initiatives," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 39(3), pages 457-481, March.
    19. K Taylor, 2002. "Assessing the Determinants of Male Earnings Dispersion," Economic Issues Journal Articles, Economic Issues, vol. 7(2), pages 35-58, September.
    20. Stephen Fothergill, 2001. "The True Scale of the Regional Problem in the UK," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(3), pages 241-246.
    21. Cardoso, Ana Rute, 2007. "Jobs for young university graduates," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 94(2), pages 271-277, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:regstd:v:35:y:2001:i:8:p:673-688. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CRES20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.