IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/regstd/v35y2001i1p11-21.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Life Duration of Small Firms Born Within a Start-up Programme: Evidence from Italy

Author

Listed:
  • Alfredo Del Monte
  • Domenico Scalera

Abstract

DEL MONTE A. and SCALERA D. (2001) The life duration of small firms born within a start-up programme: evidence from italy, Reg Studies 35, 11-21. We argue in this paper that the success of a subsidy programme should not be evaluated by comparing the survival rates of subsidized and non subsidized firms, since the purpose of subsidies is to offset a gap with firms that do not need subsidies. Secondly, we seek to identify the main factors aVecting the death probability of small firms born within a start-up programme. To this end, we conduct an empirical investigation of the firms supported by Law 44 in Italy between 1988 and 1997, finding that the amount of capital invested has a negative impact on life duration, while the capital/ labour ratio and the amount of subsidy exert a positive influuence. The main result is the unusual, negative relationship between size and survival, which we interpret in terms of the bias induced by subsidies in favour of larger and Riskier firms. DEL MONTE A. et SCALERA D. (2001) La vie des petites entreprises nees au sein d'un programme en faveur de la creation d'enteprise: des preuves provenant de l'Italie, Reg Studies 35, 11-21. Cet article cherche a affirmer que l'on ne devrait pas evaluer le succes d'un programme de subventions a partir d'une comparaison des taux de survie des entreprises subventionees ou non subventionees, puisque les subventions ont pour but de reduire l'ecart par rapport aux entreprises qui n'en ont pas besoin. En deuxieme, on cherche a identifier les facteurs cle qui influent sur la mortalite des petites enterprises nees suite au lancement d'un programme en faveur de la creation d'entreprise. D'ou l'enquete sur les entreprises subventionees dans le cadre de la 44 en Italie entre 1988 et 1997. Il s'avere que le montant du capital initial investi influe de facon negative sur la vie de l'entreprise, tandis que le rapport capitaltravail et la subvention sont plutot positifs. Il en resulte principalement un rapport inattendu et negatif entre la taille et la survie, considere comme le parti pris provoque par les subventions octroyees en faveur des enterprises plus grandes et plus aleatoires. DEL MONTE A. und SCALERA D. (2001) Die Lebensdauer kleiner Firmen, die ihre Entstehung einem Betriebsgrundungsprogramm verdanken: Beweise aus Italien, Reg Studies 35, 11-21. Dieser Aufsatz vertritt die These, dass der Erfolg eines Subventionsprogramms nicht durch Vergleich der Uberlebensraten subventionierter und nicht subventionierter Betriebe bewertet werden sollte, da der Zweck der Unterstutzung das Wettmachen eines Abstandes ist, der zwischen ersteren und solchen Betrieben besteht, die keine Subventionen benotigen. Ausserdem wird versucht, die Hauptfaktoren zu identifizieren, welche sich auf die Wahrscheinlichtkeit des Eingehens kleiner Betriebe auswirken, die ihre Entstehung einem Betriebsgrundungsprogramm verdanken. Deswegen wird eine empirische Untersuchung der im Zeitraum 1988-1997 durch das Gesetz 44 in Italien unterstutzter Betriebe durchgefuhrt, mit dem Befund, dass die Hohe des investierten Kapitals eine negative Auswirkung auf die Lebensdauer ausubt, wahrend das Verhaltnis von Kapital/Arbeitskraften und die Hohe der Subventionierung einen positiven Einfluss hat. Das Hauptergebnis ist die ungewohnliche, negative Beziehung zwischen Umfang und Uberleben, die als Voreingenommenheit interpretiert wird, deren Ursache in der grossere und riskantere Betriebe bevorzugenden Subventionszuteilung zu suchen ist.

Suggested Citation

  • Alfredo Del Monte & Domenico Scalera, 2001. "The Life Duration of Small Firms Born Within a Start-up Programme: Evidence from Italy," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(1), pages 11-21.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:regstd:v:35:y:2001:i:1:p:11-21
    DOI: 10.1080/00343400120025646
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00343400120025646
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00343400120025646?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Evans, David S, 1987. "The Relationship between Firm Growth, Size, and Age: Estimates for 100 Manufacturing Industries," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(4), pages 567-581, June.
    2. repec:bla:jindec:v:46:y:1998:i:4:p:453-88 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Wagner, Joachim, 1994. "The Post-entry Performance of New Small Firms in German Manufacturing Industries," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(2), pages 141-154, June.
    4. Dietmar Harhoff & Konrad Stahl & Michaerl Woywode, 1998. "Legal Form, Growth and Exit of West German Firms—Empirical Results for Manufacturing, Construction, Trade and Service Industries," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(4), pages 453-488, December.
    5. Mata, Jose & Portugal, Pedro, 1994. "Life Duration of New Firms," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(3), pages 227-245, September.
    6. Kiefer, Nicholas M, 1988. "Economic Duration Data and Hazard Functions," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 26(2), pages 646-679, June.
    7. Jovanovic, Boyan, 1982. "Selection and the Evolution of Industry," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 50(3), pages 649-670, May.
    8. Anna Giunta & Domenico Scalera, 1997. "Sopravvivenza e mortalità delle piccole imprese meridionali: un'applicazione dei modelli di durata," L'industria, Società editrice il Mulino, issue 3, pages 485-504.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Domenico Scalera & Alberto Zazzaro, 2002. "Subsidies, Negotiated Planning and Public Enterprise in the Italian Mezzogiorno," QA - Rivista dell'Associazione Rossi-Doria, Associazione Rossi Doria, issue 3, November.
    2. José María Millán & Emilio Congregado & Concepción Román, 2010. "Determinants of Self-Employment Dynamics and their Implications on Entrepreneurial Policy Effectiveness," Lecturas de Economía, Universidad de Antioquia, Departamento de Economía, issue 72, pages 45-76.
    3. Greene, Francis, 2012. "Should the focus of publicly provided small business assistance be on start-ups or growth businesses?," Occasional Papers 12/2, Ministry of Economic Development, New Zealand.
    4. Stjepan Srhoj & Bruno Škrinjarić & Sonja Radas, 2021. "Bidding against the odds? The impact evaluation of grants for young micro and small firms during the recession," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 56(1), pages 83-103, January.
    5. Kevin F Mole & George Bramley, 2006. "Making Policy Choices in Nonfinancial Business Support: An International Comparison," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 24(6), pages 885-908, December.
    6. Annamaria Nifo & Gaetano Vecchione, 2015. "A quali imprese vanno i sussidi pubblici? evidenza dall?industria manifatturiera italiana," RIVISTA DI ECONOMIA E STATISTICA DEL TERRITORIO, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2015(3), pages 5-28.
    7. Colombo, Massimo G. & Delmastro, Marco & Grilli, Luca, 2004. "Entrepreneurs' human capital and the start-up size of new technology-based firms," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 22(8-9), pages 1183-1211, November.
    8. Grazia Rapisarda & Eleonora Patacchini & University of Southampton, 2003. "A Study of the Effectiveness of Credit Subsidies: Evidence from a Panel of Italian Firms," Economics Series Working Papers 153, University of Oxford, Department of Economics.
    9. Guido Pellegrini & Teo Muccigrosso, 2017. "Do subsidized new firms survive longer? Evidence from a counterfactual approach," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(10), pages 1483-1493, October.
    10. José Millán & Emilio Congregado & Concepción Román, 2012. "Determinants of self-employment survival in Europe," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 38(2), pages 231-258, February.
    11. Colombo, Massimo G. & Grilli, Luca, 2005. "Start-up size: The role of external financing," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 88(2), pages 243-250, August.
    12. Destefanis, Sergio & Storti, Giuseppe, 2005. "Evaluating Business Incentives Through DEA. An Analysis on Capitalia Firm Data," MPRA Paper 62336, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Paul Plummer & Michael Taylor, 2003. "Theory and Praxis in Economic Geography: ‘Enterprising’ and Local Growth in a Global Economy," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 21(5), pages 633-649, October.
    14. Sandra M. Sánchez‐Cañizares & L. Javier Cabeza‐Ramírez & M. Dolores Guerrero‐Baena, 2020. "Evaluation of self‐employment support policies using survival analysis. The discounted flat rate in Andalusia (Spain)," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 99(5), pages 1389-1411, October.
    15. Román, Concepción & Congregado, Emilio & Millán, José María, 2013. "Start-up incentives: Entrepreneurship policy or active labour market programme?," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 151-175.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Josep-Maria Arauzo-Carod & Agustí Segarra-Blasco, 2005. "The Determinants of Entry are not Independent of Start-up Size: Some Evidence from Spanish Manufacturing," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 27(2), pages 147-165, September.
    2. Marcus Asplund & Rickard Sandin, 1999. "The Survival of New Products," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 15(3), pages 219-237, November.
    3. Pittiglio, Rosanna, 2024. "Counterfeiting and firm survival. Evidence from the Italian manufacturing industry," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 48(2).
    4. A. Arrighetti & F. Landini & A. Lasagni, 2015. "Firms’economic crisis and firm exit: do intangibles matters?," Economics Department Working Papers 2015-EP04, Department of Economics, Parma University (Italy).
    5. Audretsch, David B. & Santarelli, Enrico & Vivarelli, Marco, 1999. "Start-up size and industrial dynamics: some evidence from Italian manufacturing," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 17(7), pages 965-983, October.
    6. Buehler Stefan & Kaiser Christian & Jaeger Franz, 2005. "Competition Policy and Exit Rates: Evidence from Switzerland," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 4(1), pages 1-28, November.
    7. Audretsch, David B & Klomp, Luuk & Thurik, A R Roy, 1997. "Do Services Differ From Manufacturing? The Post-Entry Performance of Firms in Dutch Services," CEPR Discussion Papers 1718, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    8. Masatoshi Kato & Yuji Honjo, 2015. "Entrepreneurial human capital and the survival of new firms in high- and low-tech sectors," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 25(5), pages 925-957, November.
    9. Volpe Martincus, Christian & Carballo, Jerónimo, 2008. "Survival of New Exporters in Developing Countries: Does it Matter How They Diversify?," IDB Publications (Working Papers) 2494, Inter-American Development Bank.
    10. Chen, Ming-Yuan, 2002. "Survival duration of plants: Evidence from the US petroleum refining industry," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 20(4), pages 517-555, April.
    11. Ugur, Mehmet & Trushin, Eshref & Solomon, Edna, 2016. "Inverted-U relationship between R&D intensity and survival: Evidence on scale and complementarity effects in UK data," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(7), pages 1474-1492.
    12. Peter Nunnenkamp & Hannes Öhler & Tillmann Schwörer, 2011. "US based NGOs in International Development Cooperation: Survival of the Fittest?," DEGIT Conference Papers c016_046, DEGIT, Dynamics, Economic Growth, and International Trade.
    13. Dinh, Thi Thanh Binh, 2014. "Determinants to the existence of foreign firms in Vietnam," Papers 943, World Trade Institute.
    14. D.B. Audretsch & L. Klomp & E. Santarelli & A.R. Thurik, 2004. "Gibrat's Law: Are the Services Different?," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 24(3), pages 301-324, May.
    15. Marcelo Resende & Vicente Cardoso & Luis Otávio Façanha, 2016. "Determinants of survival of newly created SMEs in the Brazilian manufacturing industry: an econometric study," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 50(4), pages 1255-1274, June.
    16. Rosanna Pittiglio & Filippo Reganati, 2015. "Multinational Enterprises, Technological Intensity and Firm Survival. Evidence from Italian Manufacturing and Services Firms," Atlantic Economic Journal, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 43(1), pages 87-106, March.
    17. Filippo Randelli & Giorgio Ricchiuti, 2015. "The Survival of Tuscan Firms," Working Papers - Economics wp2015_02.rdf, Universita' degli Studi di Firenze, Dipartimento di Scienze per l'Economia e l'Impresa.
    18. Nunnenkamp, Peter & Öhler, Hannes & Schwörer, Tillmann, 2013. "US based NGOs in International Development: Financial and Economic Determinants of Survival," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 45-65.
    19. Kimura, Fukunari & Fujii, Takamune, 2003. "Globalizing activities and the rate of survival:: Panel data analysis on Japanese firms," Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, Elsevier, vol. 17(4), pages 538-560, December.
    20. Spletzer, James R, 2000. "The Contribution of Establishment Births and Deaths to Employment Growth," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, vol. 18(1), pages 113-126, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:regstd:v:35:y:2001:i:1:p:11-21. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CRES20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.