IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/regstd/v32y1998i9p797-811.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Suitable Locations: Equity and Sustainability in the Minerals Planning Process

Author

Listed:
  • Richard Cowell
  • Susan Owens

Abstract

COWELL R. and OWENS S. (1998) Suitable locations: equity and sustainability in the minerals planning process, Reg. Studies 32 , 797-811. This paper examines the connections between uneven development and sustainable development, focusing on the British land use planning system where tensions are emerging between 'environment-led' and 'balancing' interpretations of sustainability. The key argument is that the spatial dynamics of uneven development are an integral component of these tensions, and their reconciliation, as sustainable development is interpreted through planning processes in different localities and at different levels of governance. This perspective is developed by examining British minerals planning policy and the conflicts generated by the Lingerbay superquarry proposal on the Isle of Harris. While the UK Government has sought to use the planning system to find a politically acceptable 'spatial fix' for aggregates production, rather than manage resource demand, presumptions about uneven development which apparently underpin this policy are being challenged, not least for their equity implications. Interpreting sustainable development in ways which are sensitive to different contexts and the connections between them remains a major challenge. COWELL R. et OWENS S. (1998) L'adequation des emplacements: les notions d'equite et de renouvellement au sein des projets visant l'extraction des minerais, Reg. Studies 32 , 797-811. Portant sur les plans d'occupation du sol britanniques qui se caracterisent par la naissance des tensions entre l'interpretation du renouvellement qui favorise une facon 'ecologique' et celle qui prone une approche plus 'equilibree', cet article cherche a examiner les liens qui existent entre les notions de developpement irregulier et de developpement durable. L'argument principal est que la dynamique spatiale du developpement irregulier fait partie integrante de ces tensions-la, et de leur resolution, parce que le developpement durable se voit interpreter par voie des systemes de planification dans des endroits divers et a des niveaux d'administration differents. Cette perspective se developpe en examinant la politique britannique visant l'extraction des minerais et les conflits qui ont ete engendres suite a la proposition en faveur du developpement d'une grande carriere sur l'ile de Harris. Alors que le gouvernement britannique cherchait a se servir du systeme de planification pour decouvrir un emplacement destine a la production des agregats et susceptible d'etre acceptable du point de vue politique, plutot que de maitriser la demande de ressources, il semble que des suppositions au sujet du developpement irregulier qui sont a la base de cette politique se voient contester, a commencer par les consequences pour ce qui concerne la notion d'equite. L'interpretation du developpement durable dans des manieres qui repondent aux contextes differents et aux liens qui existent, reste a faire. COWELL R. und OWENS S. (1998) Angemessene Standorte: Recht und Billigkeit und Nachhaltigkeit bei der Mineralgewinnung, Reg. Studies 32 , 797-811. Dieser Aufsatz untersucht Verknupfungen von ungleichmassiger und nachhaltiger Entwicklung, wobei die Hauptaufmerksamkeit sich auf das britische Planungssystem in Fragen der Bodennutzung konzentriert, wo Spannungen zwischen 'umgebungsbegrundeten' und 'gleichgewichtsbestimmenden' Interpretationen der Nachhaltigkeit auftreten. Das Hauptargument ist, dass die raumliche Dynamik ungleichmassiger Entwicklung ein integraler Bestandteil dieser Spannungen und ihres Ausgleichs ist, da nachhaltige Enrwicklung mit Hilfe von Planungsprosessen au verschiedenen Orten und auf verschiedenen Ebenen der Regierung interpretiert wird. Diese Perspektive wird mittels Untersuchung der britischen Planungspolitik in Fragen der Mineralgewinnung und der Konflikte entwickelt, die durch den Plan von Lingerbay entstanden sind, auf der Insel Harris einen Riesensteinbruch zu eroffnen. Wahrend die Regierung des Vereinigten Konigreichs sich bemuht, auf der Grundlage des Planungssystems ein politisch annehmbares 'Raumrezept' fur die Produktion von Aggregaten zu finden, statt die Nachfrage nach Rohstoffen zu steuern, werden Annahmen bezuglich ungleichmassiger Entwicklung angegriffen, die dieser Politik zu Grunde liegen, nicht zuletzt der Implikationen ihrer Recht und Billigkeit wegen. Die Interpretation nachhaltiger Entwicklung auf eine Art und Weise, die verschiedenen Zusammenhangen und ihren Verbindungen untereinander gerecht wird, bleibt weiterhin eine Hauptaufgabe.

Suggested Citation

  • Richard Cowell & Susan Owens, 1998. "Suitable Locations: Equity and Sustainability in the Minerals Planning Process," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(9), pages 797-811.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:regstd:v:32:y:1998:i:9:p:797-811
    DOI: 10.1080/00343409850117960
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00343409850117960
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00343409850117960?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. World Commission on Environment and Development,, 1987. "Our Common Future," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780192820808, Decembrie.
    2. M G Reed & O Slaymaker, 1993. "Ethics and Sustainability: A Preliminary Perspective," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 25(5), pages 723-739, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. A. Mateus & C. Lopes & L. Martins & J. Carvalho, 2017. "Towards a multi-dimensional methodology supporting a safeguarding decision on the future access to mineral resources," Mineral Economics, Springer;Raw Materials Group (RMG);Luleå University of Technology, vol. 30(3), pages 229-255, October.
    2. Wolsink, Maarten, 2007. "Wind power implementation: The nature of public attitudes: Equity and fairness instead of 'backyard motives'," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 11(6), pages 1188-1207, August.
    3. Lopes, C. & Lisboa, V. & Carvalho, J. & Mateus, A. & Martins, L., 2018. "Challenges to access and safeguard mineral resources for society: A case study of kaolin in Portugal," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 263-284.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. CHEN, Helen S.Y., 2020. "Designing Sustainable Humanitarian Supply Chains," OSF Preprints m82ar, Center for Open Science.
    2. Denise Ravet, 2011. "Lean production: the link between supply chain and sustainable development in an international environment," Post-Print hal-00691666, HAL.
    3. Mara Del Baldo, 2012. "Corporate social responsibility and corporate governance in Italian SMEs: the experience of some “spirited businesses”," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 16(1), pages 1-36, February.
    4. Michael Howes & Liana Wortley & Ruth Potts & Aysin Dedekorkut-Howes & Silvia Serrao-Neumann & Julie Davidson & Timothy Smith & Patrick Nunn, 2017. "Environmental Sustainability: A Case of Policy Implementation Failure?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-17, January.
    5. Parnphumeesup, Piya & Kerr, Sandy A., 2011. "Stakeholder preferences towards the sustainable development of CDM projects: Lessons from biomass (rice husk) CDM project in Thailand," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(6), pages 3591-3601, June.
    6. Chin-Shan Lu & Kuo-Chung Shang & Chi-Chang Lin, 2016. "Examining sustainability performance at ports: port managers’ perspectives on developing sustainable supply chains," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(8), pages 909-927, November.
    7. Kebede, Yohannes, 1993. "The Limits to Common Resource Management: The Bypassed Commons or Commons without Tragedy," MPRA Paper 662, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 01 May 1993.
    8. John Stanley & Janet Stanley, 2023. "Improving Appraisal Methodology for Land Use Transport Measures to Reduce Risk of Social Exclusion," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-18, August.
    9. Nora Mzavanadze, 2009. "Building A Framework For National Sustainable Development Assessment And Application For Lithuania: Sustainability In Transition," Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management (JEAPM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 11(01), pages 97-130.
    10. Pishchulov, Grigory & Trautrims, Alexander & Chesney, Thomas & Gold, Stefan & Schwab, Leila, 2019. "The Voting Analytic Hierarchy Process revisited: A revised method with application to sustainable supplier selection," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 166-179.
    11. Isin Ceti̇n, 2017. "Accounting Requirements And Records On Bank Subscribed Capital Compliance With European Directives," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1, pages 52-68, February.
    12. Jean-Michel Sahuta & Sandrine Boulerne & Medhi Mili & Frédéric Teulon, 2014. "What Relation Exists Between Corporate Social Responsibility (Csr) And Longevity Of Firms?," Working Papers 2014-248, Department of Research, Ipag Business School.
    13. Alba Rocio Gutierrez Garzon & Pete Bettinger & Jacek Siry & Bin Mei & Jesse Abrams, 2019. "The Terms Foresters and Planners in the United States Use to Infer Sustainability in Forest Management Plans: A Survey Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-20, December.
    14. Shehu Folaranmi Gbolahan Yusuf & Oluwabunmi Oluwaseun Popoola & Lindokhule Gwala & Thinandavha Nesengani, 2021. "Promoting University–Community Alliances in the Experiential Learning Activities of Agricultural Extension Postgraduate Students at the University of Fort Hare, South Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-18, September.
    15. Filipa Correia & Philipp Erfruth & Julie Bryhn, 2018. "The 2030 Agenda: The roadmap to GlobALLizaton," Working Papers 156, United Nations, Department of Economics and Social Affairs.
    16. Choy Yee Keong, 2005. "Sustainable Development—An Institutional Enclave (with Special Reference to the Bakun Dam–Induced Development Strategy in Malaysia)," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(4), pages 951-971, December.
    17. Anthony Bennett, 1998. "Sustainable public/private partnerships for public service delivery," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 22(3), pages 193-199, August.
    18. Smith, Joyotee & Scherr, Sara J., 2003. "Capturing the Value of Forest Carbon for Local Livelihoods," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 31(12), pages 2143-2160, December.
    19. Buys, Piet & Chomitz, Ken & Dasgupta, Susmita & Deichmann, Uwe & Larsen, Bjorn & Meisner, Craig & Nygard, Jostein & Pandey, Kiran & Pinnoi, Nat & Wheeler, David, 2006. "The economics of decentralized poverty-environment programs: An application for Lao PDR," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 28(7), pages 811-824, October.
    20. Lisa Knoche, 2014. "Nachhaltigkeit in Unternehmen und Organisationen - Umweltmanagementsysteme als Instrument zur ökologischen Prägung der Organisationskultur," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 67(17), pages 29-37, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:regstd:v:32:y:1998:i:9:p:797-811. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CRES20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.