Author
Listed:
- Ian Tennant
- Ana Paula Oliveira
Abstract
After two years of intense negotiations in a highly political process mandated to elaborate a comprehensive ‘International Convention on Countering the Use of Information and Communication Technologies', member states of the United Nations, in August 2024, agreed on a new United Nations Convention against Cybercrime [UNODC AHC website. 2024a. https://www.unodc.org/documents/Cybercrime/AdHocCommittee/Comments/RF_28_July_2021_-_E.pdf; UNODC AHC website. 2024b. https://documents.un.org/doc/undoc/gen/v24/055/06/pdf/v2405506.pdf]. The Ad Hoc Committee (AHC) mandated to carry out the negotiation process drew extensively from United Nations Convention Against Transnational Organized Crime (UNTOC) and United Nations Convention Against Corruption (UNCAC), specifically in its approaches to criminalisation, international cooperation and law enforcement/procedural measures. Therefore, questions are raised as to what lessons from UNTOC and UNCAC implementation should be learned as member states begin the process of ratification and subsequently implementation, and as the AHC finalises its work in preparing the convention's conference of parties and implementation mechanisms – on review, accountability, transparency and multistakeholder approaches. The paper will explore the different perspectives from the history of UNTOC's negotiation and implementation that need to be considered as the convention is sent for formal adoption. First, it undertakes a focused literature review on the UNTOC and UNCAC and its travaux preparatoires of such provisions. The paper explains the background of the relevant negotiation decisions and the effects that it had on the convention’s scope and implementation. It explores the benefits and shortcomings of the related approaches taken in the cybercrime treaty. The paper concludes with lessons learned from the implementation of UNTOC and UNCAC.
Suggested Citation
Ian Tennant & Ana Paula Oliveira, 2024.
"Applying the right lessons from the negotiation and implementation of the UNTOC and the UNCAC to the implementation of the newly agreed UN ‘cybercrime’ treaty,"
Journal of Cyber Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(2), pages 221-238, May.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:rcybxx:v:9:y:2024:i:2:p:221-238
DOI: 10.1080/23738871.2024.2428655
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rcybxx:v:9:y:2024:i:2:p:221-238. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rcyb .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.