IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rcybxx/v8y2023i1p88-113.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Patchy incentives: using law to encourage effective vulnerability response

Author

Listed:
  • Andrew Cormack
  • Éireann Leverett

Abstract

Data breach reports suggest that managing patches is hard: too many major incidents are caused by well-known software vulnerabilities with available fixes. Legal sanctions – from mandates to liability – apparently have limited effect. This paper discusses how an effective vulnerability response process can help software users allocate their remediation effort to minimise overall risk and disruption. We analyse laws and regulations on liability, product quality and patching mandates to see why they fail to promote good practice. Recent cases under privacy laws highlight features that make risk-based patching a better basis for system managers, executives and regulators to agree a common approach to effective vulnerability response.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrew Cormack & Éireann Leverett, 2023. "Patchy incentives: using law to encourage effective vulnerability response," Journal of Cyber Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(1), pages 88-113, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:rcybxx:v:8:y:2023:i:1:p:88-113
    DOI: 10.1080/23738871.2023.2284233
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/23738871.2023.2284233
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/23738871.2023.2284233?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rcybxx:v:8:y:2023:i:1:p:88-113. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rcyb .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.