IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rcybxx/v4y2019i3p309-325.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Some emotional considerations in cyber conflict

Author

Listed:
  • Rose McDermott

Abstract

One of the most neglected and important aspects of cyber conflict involves the role of emotions in decision-making and its potential influence on the cyber domain in particular. This paper constitutes an initial attempt to examine some of the policy implications of neglecting or omitting emotional factors from our understanding of decision-making in the cyber realm. Several elements of cyber conflict, including secrecy, overlap with other kinds of conflict, while other aspects, such as the speed of computation, present unique and novel challenges. This discussion focuses on cyber conflict. Because the effects of emotion on judgement and decision-making, as well as behaviour, are not specific to the realm of cyberspace, this examination begins with a broader discussion of more recent literature in psychology and neuroscience on the effects of emotion on both choice and action. It then proceeds with a more detailed examination of the influence of specific emotions on decision-making in cyber conflict. It concludes with some of the possible political implications that follow from a fuller recognition of the role of emotions on conflict. An understanding of the role of human emotion in decision-making is essential to achieve effective and accurate policy in the cyber realm.

Suggested Citation

  • Rose McDermott, 2019. "Some emotional considerations in cyber conflict," Journal of Cyber Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(3), pages 309-325, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rcybxx:v:4:y:2019:i:3:p:309-325
    DOI: 10.1080/23738871.2019.1701692
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/23738871.2019.1701692
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/23738871.2019.1701692?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Eric Jardine & Nathaniel Porter & Ryan Shandler, 2024. "Cyberattacks and public opinion – The effect of uncertainty in guiding preferences," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 61(1), pages 103-118, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rcybxx:v:4:y:2019:i:3:p:309-325. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rcyb .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.