IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rcybxx/v4y2019i1p35-55.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A critical strategy for Taiwan’s cybersecurity: a perspective from critical security studies

Author

Listed:
  • Hon-min Yau

Abstract

This paper examines Taiwan’s cybersecurity from the perspective of Critical Security Studies (CSS), also known as the Welsh School. It eschews a conventional realist approach to cybersecurity and addresses Taiwan’s state-centric need while attending to considerations of global cybersecurity. It claims that Taiwan’s cybersecurity can be improved without being militarised, zero-sum or confrontational and that one nation’s cybersecurity is not necessarily another’s insecurity.The paper starts by explaining the decision to bring CSS into the question. Informed by CSS, it moves on to understand how cyberwarfare naturally became the dominant discourse of cybersecurity in Taiwan. It next examines the limitations of ‘generally-accepted’ assumptions regarding cyberwarfare. Then, the paper explores the problematic effects of cyberwarfare within Taiwan’s security context. Finally, it proposes a critical strategy to engage Taiwan’s security challenge while avoiding the adverse consequences of implementing cyberwarfare.The paper is a reminder to evaluate Taiwan’s cybersecurity in a contemporary and theoretically-grounded framework.

Suggested Citation

  • Hon-min Yau, 2019. "A critical strategy for Taiwan’s cybersecurity: a perspective from critical security studies," Journal of Cyber Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(1), pages 35-55, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rcybxx:v:4:y:2019:i:1:p:35-55
    DOI: 10.1080/23738871.2019.1604782
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/23738871.2019.1604782
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/23738871.2019.1604782?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rcybxx:v:4:y:2019:i:1:p:35-55. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rcyb .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.