IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rcitxx/v26y2023i14p2389-2404.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The issue of methodological rigour within the data collection process in tourism and sports studies investigating the economic impact of sporting events

Author

Listed:
  • Darko Dimitrovski
  • Miljan Leković
  • Marijana Đurađević

Abstract

The economic impact of sporting events continues to attract the interest of academics and marketers globally. This paper aims to identify the issues concerning methodological rigour within the data collection process in relation to contemporary sporting event impact assessment studies. A critical review of tourism and sports literature was undertaken to propose an integrated data collection framework and scenario-driven research agenda. The paper contributes to existing knowledge in the field by systemising common methodological challenges and revealing alternative research paths with the aim of ensuring a methodologically reliable data collection process. The rationale for conducting the research is reflected in the fact that methodological issues related to data collection represent a common obstacle to accurate assessment of the economic impact of sporting events. The framework and research agenda could prove to be a valuable guideline for authors interested in researching the subject matter and thus would contribute to the progression of academic knowledge.

Suggested Citation

  • Darko Dimitrovski & Miljan Leković & Marijana Đurađević, 2023. "The issue of methodological rigour within the data collection process in tourism and sports studies investigating the economic impact of sporting events," Current Issues in Tourism, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(14), pages 2389-2404, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rcitxx:v:26:y:2023:i:14:p:2389-2404
    DOI: 10.1080/13683500.2022.2086452
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13683500.2022.2086452
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13683500.2022.2086452?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rcitxx:v:26:y:2023:i:14:p:2389-2404. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rcit .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.