IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rajsxx/v14y2022i2p392-404.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Factors influencing biometric technology adoption: Empirical evidence from Nigeria

Author

Listed:
  • O. Bello
  • O. Olanrewaju

Abstract

An exploratory investigation of factors influencing adoption of biometric technologies among public and private organizations in Nigeria is carried out in this study. Based on a modified technology-organization-environment (TOE) theoretical framework, an empirical analysis using data from questionnaires surveyed on these organizations was performed. The results show that compatibility, organizational size, top management support, trust between organizations, competitive pressure and uncertainty have significant influence on biometric technology adoption among these organizations. However, there is not enough evidence to support complexity, relative advantage, cost, employee resistance, technical knowledge and government support as having significant effect on biometric technology adoption. The implication of this study is that decision-makers in organizations need to pay more attention to the factors influencing biometric technology adoption in order to prevent fraud, curb insecurity and restrict unauthorized access to their digital and physical assets.

Suggested Citation

  • O. Bello & O. Olanrewaju, 2022. "Factors influencing biometric technology adoption: Empirical evidence from Nigeria," African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(2), pages 392-404, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rajsxx:v:14:y:2022:i:2:p:392-404
    DOI: 10.1080/20421338.2020.1837415
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/20421338.2020.1837415
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/20421338.2020.1837415?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rajsxx:v:14:y:2022:i:2:p:392-404. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rajs .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.