IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/pocoec/v16y2004i1p3-20.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Russian accession to the WTO—why such a long and difficult road?

Author

Listed:
  • David Dyker

Abstract

Russia has been negotiating for accession to the WTO for some ten years, and there is still no prospect of an immediate conclusion to the process. The reasons for this are partly to be found in the international environment. In the past, the geo-strategic concerns of the Western powers have created barriers to Russian integration into global trading structures. Even in the new, post-September 11 environment, existing WTO members have continued to use the WTO accession process as a way of advancing their own commercial policies vis-a-vis Russia. But the main obstacles to speedy accession have been internal. While the Russian government as a whole is strongly in favour of WTO accession as a way of strengthening the market mechanism and reform processes within the country, significant elements within it are equally strongly in favour of high levels of protection for specific sectors, on national security and/or technological/infant industry grounds. While the Russian business community as a whole is divided over the merits of accession, the powerful manufacturing and banking lobbies are demanding levels of protection that would almost certainly be incompatible with accession. Russian views of WTO accession vary widely, within both government and the business community, and anyone who would lobby in favour of accession within Russia must bear this firmly in mind.

Suggested Citation

  • David Dyker, 2004. "Russian accession to the WTO—why such a long and difficult road?," Post-Communist Economies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(1), pages 3-20.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:pocoec:v:16:y:2004:i:1:p:3-20
    DOI: 10.1080/1463137042000194816
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/1463137042000194816
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/1463137042000194816?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David Dyker, 2000. "The Structural Origins of the Russian Economic Crisis," Post-Communist Economies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(1), pages 5-24.
    2. Dyker, David A., 2001. "Technology exchange and the foreign business sector in Russia," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(5), pages 851-868, May.
    3. Philip Hanson, 1997. "What sort of capitalism is developing in Russia?," Post-Communist Economies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(1), pages 27-42.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Frode Nilssen & Geir Hønneland, 2001. "Institutional Change and the Problems of Restructuring the Russian Fishing Industry," Post-Communist Economies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(3), pages 313-330.
    2. David Dyker, 2000. "The Structural Origins of the Russian Economic Crisis," Post-Communist Economies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(1), pages 5-24.
    3. Miroslav Šipikal & Milan Buček, 2018. "The Role of FDI in Regional Innovation and Its Influence on the Emergence of Knowledge Spillover Effects," Advances in Spatial Science, in: Jan Stejskal & Petr Hajek & Oto Hudec (ed.), Knowledge Spillovers in Regional Innovation Systems, pages 195-218, Springer.
    4. Jonathan Oldfield, 2000. "Structural Economic Change and the Natural Environment in the Russian Federation," Post-Communist Economies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(1), pages 77-90.
    5. Narula, Rajneesh & Jormanainen, Irina, 2008. "When a good science base is not enough to create competitive industries: Lock-in and inertia in Russian systems of innovation," MERIT Working Papers 2008-059, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    6. Mario Gara, 2001. "The Emergence of Non-monetary Means of Payment in the Russian Economy," Post-Communist Economies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(1), pages 5-39.
    7. Nivedita Das Kundu, 2001. "Indo-Russian Trade Relations: An Overview," India Quarterly: A Journal of International Affairs, , vol. 57(3), pages 119-138, July.
    8. Roberta Capello & Camilla Lenzi, 2013. "Territorial patterns of innovation: a taxonomy of innovative regions in Europe," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 51(1), pages 119-154, August.
    9. Yuandi Wang & Xin Pan & Lutao Ning & Jian Li & Jin Chen, 2015. "Technology exchange patterns in China: an analysis of regional data," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 40(2), pages 252-272, April.
    10. P Dostál, 1998. "Democratization, Economic Liberalization, and Transformational Slump: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Twenty-One Postcommunist Countries," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 16(3), pages 281-306, June.
    11. David Parker, 1999. "Water and Waste Water Services in the Russian Federation: A Study of Four Vodokanaly," Post-Communist Economies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(2), pages 219-235.
    12. Jan Stejskal & Petr Hajek & Oto Hudec (ed.), 2018. "Knowledge Spillovers in Regional Innovation Systems," Advances in Spatial Science, Springer, number 978-3-319-67029-4.
    13. Estrin, Saul & Wright, Mike, 1999. "Corporate Governance in the Former Soviet Union: An Overview," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 27(3), pages 398-421, September.
    14. Nansi Paulraj, 2016. "The JCPOA and Changing Dimensions of the Russia–Iran Relations," Contemporary Review of the Middle East, , vol. 3(1), pages 95-110, March.
    15. Ruth Rama, 2008. "Foreign investment innovation: a review of selected policies," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 33(4), pages 353-363, August.
    16. Andrea Caragliu & Camilla Lenzi & Miroslav Šipikal & Milan Buček, 2013. "The role of FDIs in regional innovation: Evidence from the automotive industry in Western Slovakia," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 5(4), pages 475-490, November.
    17. Martin Johanson & Jan Johanson, 2006. "Turbulence, discovery and foreign market entry: A longitudinal study of an entry into the Russian market," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 46(2), pages 179-205, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:pocoec:v:16:y:2004:i:1:p:3-20. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CPCE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.