IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/mimoxx/v29y1999i2p113-126.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Competing Logics and Units of Analysis in the Comparative Study of Economic Organization

Author

Listed:
  • Richard Whitley

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Richard Whitley, 1999. "Competing Logics and Units of Analysis in the Comparative Study of Economic Organization," International Studies of Management & Organization, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(2), pages 113-126, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:mimoxx:v:29:y:1999:i:2:p:113-126
    DOI: 10.1080/00208825.1999.11656766
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00208825.1999.11656766
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00208825.1999.11656766?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Luo, Yadong, 2007. "From foreign investors to strategic insiders: Shifting parameters, prescriptions and paradigms for MNCs in China," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 14-34, March.
    2. ., 2010. "Cultural Effects on the Korean Economy," Chapters, in: The Korean Economy in Transition, chapter 2, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    3. Ding, Yuan & Richard, Jacques & Stolowy, Hervé, 2008. "Towards an understanding of the phases of goodwill accounting in four Western capitalist countries: From stakeholder model to shareholder model," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 33(7-8), pages 718-755.
    4. Rana, Mohammad B. & Morgan, Glenn, 2019. "Twenty-five years of business systems research and lessons for international business studies," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 513-532.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:mimoxx:v:29:y:1999:i:2:p:113-126. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/mimo .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.