IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/marpmg/v43y2016i6p683-705.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Productivity change of the Spanish Port System: impact of the economic crisis

Author

Listed:
  • A. Medal-Bartual
  • M. Molinos-Senante
  • R. Sala-Garrido

Abstract

The main goal of this study was to assess the impact of the economic crisis on the productivity growth of the Spanish Port System (SPS). The Malmquist Productivity Index (MPI) was estimated for the 28 Port Authorities of the SPS, for a ‘non-crisis period’ (2005–2008) and a ‘crisis period’ (2008–2011). From a policy perspective, the MPI is a very useful approach for assessing the productivity change because it can be decomposed into the catching-up index and the frontier productivity index. The results showed that the economic crisis did not impact all of the Spanish Port Authorities equally. Some Port Authorities presented higher productivity growth during the crisis period than in the non-crisis period. Further analysis by the Mann–Whitney test revealed that Port Authority investments and productivity growth were statistically related. Information provided by this study may be very useful for stakeholders and decision-makers, in terms of long-term strategic planning and improving the competitiveness of the SPS. The findings illustrate that the economic crisis should not be seen as an international tragedy, but as an opportunity to adapt port traffics and installations to new needs and market demands.

Suggested Citation

  • A. Medal-Bartual & M. Molinos-Senante & R. Sala-Garrido, 2016. "Productivity change of the Spanish Port System: impact of the economic crisis," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(6), pages 683-705, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:marpmg:v:43:y:2016:i:6:p:683-705
    DOI: 10.1080/03088839.2016.1182653
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03088839.2016.1182653
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03088839.2016.1182653?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pérez, Ivone & González, María Manuela & Trujillo, Lourdes, 2020. "Do specialisation and port size affect port efficiency? Evidence from cargo handling service in Spanish ports," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 234-249.
    2. Tovar, Beatriz & Wall, Alan, 2019. "Are larger and more complex port more productive? An analysis of Spanish port authorities," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 265-276.
    3. Chang, Víctor & Tovar, Beatriz, 2017. "Metafrontier analysis on productivity for West Coast of South Pacific terminals," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 118-134.
    4. Zhang, Qiang & Yan, Kai & Yang, Dong, 2021. "Port system evolution in Chinese coastal regions: A provincial perspective," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    5. Hynes, S. & Mateo-Mantecón, I. & O’Connor, E. & Tsakiridis, A., 2019. "Examining the relationship between relative size and technical efficiency in peripheral port markets: Evidence from Irish and North Atlantic Spanish ports," Working Papers 309603, National University of Ireland, Galway, Socio-Economic Marine Research Unit.
    6. Stephen Hynes & Ingrid Mateo-Mantecón & Eamonn O’Connor & Andreas Tsakiridis, 2020. "Relative size and technical efficiency in peripheral port markets: evidence from Irish and North Atlantic Spanish ports," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 22(3), pages 383-402, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:marpmg:v:43:y:2016:i:6:p:683-705. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/TMPM20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.