IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/lstaxx/v44y2015i14p2933-2944.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Consumer’s Risk and Costs in Zero-Acceptance Number Sampling

Author

Listed:
  • K. Govindaraju
  • M. Bebbington

Abstract

The primary purpose of sampling inspection is the protection of consumer’s interests. Although under simple cost models, sampling inspection never serves the producer’s interest, some form of sampling inspection can be beneficial to the consumer under the same assumptions. We consider the case of isolated lot inspection and examine the consumer risk, economic sample design, and errors in the inspection process. Acceptance sampling is shown to be cost-effective to the consumer whenever the lot quality is less than perfect, and even for perfect lot quality in the presence of inspection errors.

Suggested Citation

  • K. Govindaraju & M. Bebbington, 2015. "The Consumer’s Risk and Costs in Zero-Acceptance Number Sampling," Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(14), pages 2933-2944, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:lstaxx:v:44:y:2015:i:14:p:2933-2944
    DOI: 10.1080/03610926.2013.768661
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03610926.2013.768661
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03610926.2013.768661?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chien-Chih Wang & Yu-Shan Chang, 2023. "Dynamic Acceptance Sampling Strategy Based on Product Quality Performance Using Examples from IC Test Factory," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-16, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:lstaxx:v:44:y:2015:i:14:p:2933-2944. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/lsta .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.