IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v11y2023i13p2872-d1180458.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dynamic Acceptance Sampling Strategy Based on Product Quality Performance Using Examples from IC Test Factory

Author

Listed:
  • Chien-Chih Wang

    (Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, Ming Chi University of Technology, New Taipei City 243303, Taiwan)

  • Yu-Shan Chang

    (BellWether Electronic Corporation, Taoyuan City 330010, Taiwan)

Abstract

Acceptance sampling plans are divided into attributes and variables, which are used to evaluate the mechanism for determining lot quality. Traditional attribute sampling plans usually choose the Acceptable Quality Level (AQL) for each stage based on experience but need practical guidelines to follow. Previous research endeavors have predominantly centered around statistical perspectives and emphasized the reduction of sample size or sampling frequency while allocating lesser consideration to cost factors and practical applications when formulating sampling decisions. This study proposes a dynamic sampling strategy to minimize costs and estimate AQL values and sample sizes for each stage based on product quality performance to establish a more effective and flexible sampling strategy. The study verifies the scenario in an integrated circuit (IC) testing factory, considering multiple combinations of between-batch quality conditions, within-batch quality conditions, sampling method, and cost ratio, and conducts sampling inspection simulations. When quality changes, the dynamic strategy is activated to adjust AQL. Finally, based on the sampling errors and costs in the inspection results, a comparison is made with the traditional MIL-STD-105E sampling plan, confirming that the dynamic AQL sampling plan has significantly improved performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Chien-Chih Wang & Yu-Shan Chang, 2023. "Dynamic Acceptance Sampling Strategy Based on Product Quality Performance Using Examples from IC Test Factory," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-16, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:11:y:2023:i:13:p:2872-:d:1180458
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/11/13/2872/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/11/13/2872/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Markowski, Edward P. & Markowski, Carol A., 2002. "Improved attribute acceptance sampling plans in the presence of misclassification error," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(3), pages 501-510, June.
    2. Mahendra Saha & Harsh Tripathi & Sanku Dey & Sudhansu S. Maiti, 2021. "Acceptance sampling inspection plan for the Lindley and power Lindley distributed quality characteristics," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 12(6), pages 1410-1419, December.
    3. Stijn Luca, 2018. "Modified chain sampling plans for lot inspection by variables and attributes," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(8), pages 1447-1464, June.
    4. Yusra Tashkandy & Walid Emam & M. Masoom Ali & Haitham M. Yousof & Basma Ahmed, 2023. "Quality Control Testing with Experimental Practical Illustrations under the Modified Lindley Distribution Using Single, Double, and Multiple Acceptance Sampling Plans," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-28, May.
    5. K. Govindaraju & M. Bebbington, 2015. "The Consumer’s Risk and Costs in Zero-Acceptance Number Sampling," Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(14), pages 2933-2944, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Harsh Tripathi & Mahendra Saha & Sanku Dey, 2022. "A new approach of time truncated chain sampling inspection plan and its applications," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 13(5), pages 2307-2326, October.
    2. Majid Hashempour & Morad Alizadeh & Haitham M. Yousof, 2024. "A New Lindley Extension: Estimation, Risk Assessment and Analysis Under Bimodal Right Skewed Precipitation Data," Annals of Data Science, Springer, vol. 11(6), pages 1919-1958, December.
    3. Yusra Tashkandy & Walid Emam & M. Masoom Ali & Haitham M. Yousof & Basma Ahmed, 2023. "Quality Control Testing with Experimental Practical Illustrations under the Modified Lindley Distribution Using Single, Double, and Multiple Acceptance Sampling Plans," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-28, May.
    4. Qin, Ruwen & Cudney, Elizabeth A. & Hamzic, Zlatan, 2015. "An optimal plan of zero-defect single-sampling by attributes for incoming inspections in assembly lines," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 246(3), pages 907-915.
    5. Mahendra Saha & Harsh Tripathi & Anju Devi & Pratibha Pareek, 2024. "Applications of Reliability Test Plan for Logistic Rayleigh Distributed Quality Characteristic," Annals of Data Science, Springer, vol. 11(5), pages 1687-1703, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:11:y:2023:i:13:p:2872-:d:1180458. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.