IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/lpadxx/v43y2020i10p890-899.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Contract completeness as a foundation to relationship building among stakeholders in public private partnership projects

Author

Listed:
  • Rogers Mwesigwa
  • Vincent Bagire
  • Joseph Ntayi
  • John Munene

Abstract

The purpose of this paper study is to provide evidence on whether contract completeness is a foundation to relationship building among stakeholders in public–private partnership projects in Uganda. Data were collected by means of a questionnaire survey from a sample of 135 public–private partnership projects in Uganda. Partial Least squares structural equation modeling was used to analyze the data. All the Contract completeness dimensions were found to be positively and significantly associated with relationship building among stakeholders in PPP projects in Uganda. This implies that contract completeness is a cornerstone to relationship building. Results imply that when all the relevant issues are included in the contract, contract terms are explicitly stipulated, unanticipated changes are described and when all the parties involved are restrained by a binding force of a contract, relationship building will be boosted among stakeholders in PPP projects. Since little is known on how to build lasting relationships among stakeholders in public–private partnership projects, this study thus extends a debate on how a complete contract can build lasting relationships among stakeholders.

Suggested Citation

  • Rogers Mwesigwa & Vincent Bagire & Joseph Ntayi & John Munene, 2020. "Contract completeness as a foundation to relationship building among stakeholders in public private partnership projects," International Journal of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(10), pages 890-899, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:lpadxx:v:43:y:2020:i:10:p:890-899
    DOI: 10.1080/01900692.2019.1660993
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01900692.2019.1660993
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01900692.2019.1660993?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:lpadxx:v:43:y:2020:i:10:p:890-899. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/lpad .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.