IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/lpadxx/v31y2008i9p1095-1109.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rethinking the Response of Part-Time Professionals: The Case of the Part-Time Police Officer

Author

Listed:
  • Rosie Hyde

Abstract

Despite marginalisation in the workplace, the part-time professional has been found to express acceptance towards their position. It has been suggested that the part-time professional chooses to prioritise non-work activities and is therefore untroubled by their marginal status. This paper however, adopts a social constructionist approach and considers the way in which choices are influenced by societal and discursive forces. This paper draws upon a study of female, part-time police officers and concludes that their acceptance may be part of the ongoing identity work of the part-time professional.

Suggested Citation

  • Rosie Hyde, 2008. "Rethinking the Response of Part-Time Professionals: The Case of the Part-Time Police Officer," International Journal of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(9), pages 1095-1109.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:lpadxx:v:31:y:2008:i:9:p:1095-1109
    DOI: 10.1080/01900690801945699
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01900690801945699
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01900690801945699?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sue Williamson & Rae Cooper & Marian Baird, 2015. "Job-sharing among teachers: Positive, negative (and unintended) consequences," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 26(3), pages 448-464, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:lpadxx:v:31:y:2008:i:9:p:1095-1109. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/lpad .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.