IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jsustf/v2y2012i3-4p338-375.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The drivers of the relationship between corporate environmental performance and stock market returns

Author

Listed:
  • Marien de Haan
  • Lammertjan Dam
  • Bert Scholtens

Abstract

Is there a relationship between corporate environmental performance (CEP) and stock returns? And if so, what drives this relationship: changes in corporate risk exposure or mispricing because of investors' taste for high CEP stocks, based on personal values or social norms? To answer these questions, we use a new and comprehensive ranking that measures the environmental performance of the 500 largest publicly traded US corporations. Our methodology is based on the Fama--French--Carhart four-factor asset-pricing model. In addition, we incorporate a fifth factor to capture common CEP-related risks. The results point to a negative relationship between CEP and stock returns, partially driven by common CEP-related risks. At the same time though, the influence of taste cannot be ruled out.

Suggested Citation

  • Marien de Haan & Lammertjan Dam & Bert Scholtens, 2012. "The drivers of the relationship between corporate environmental performance and stock market returns," Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2(3-4), pages 338-375, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:jsustf:v:2:y:2012:i:3-4:p:338-375
    DOI: 10.1080/20430795.2012.738601
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/20430795.2012.738601
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/20430795.2012.738601?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jan Endrikat, 2016. "Market Reactions to Corporate Environmental Performance Related Events: A Meta-analytic Consolidation of the Empirical Evidence," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 138(3), pages 535-548, October.
    2. Ciciretti, Rocco & Dalò, Ambrogio & Dam, Lammertjan, 2023. "The contributions of betas versus characteristics to the ESG premium," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 104-124.
    3. Andreas G. F. Hoepner & Lisa Schopohl, 2020. "State Pension Funds and Corporate Social Responsibility: Do Beneficiaries’ Political Values Influence Funds’ Investment Decisions?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 165(3), pages 489-516, September.
    4. Riikka Sievänen & Hannu Rita & Bert Scholtens, 2017. "European Pension Funds and Sustainable Development: Trade‐Offs between Finance and Responsibility," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(7), pages 912-926, November.
    5. Becchetti, Leonardo & Ciciretti, Rocco & Dalò, Ambrogio, 2018. "Fishing the Corporate Social Responsibility risk factors," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 25-48.
    6. Guido Abate & Ignazio Basile & Pierpaolo Ferrari, 2021. "The level of sustainability and mutual fund performance in Europe: An empirical analysis using ESG ratings," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(5), pages 1446-1455, September.
    7. Federica Ielasi & Paolo Ceccherini & Pietro Zito, 2020. "Integrating ESG Analysis into Smart Beta Strategies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-22, November.
    8. Tommy Gärling & Magnus Jansson, 2021. "Sustainable Investment: Consequences for Psychological Well-Being," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-10, August.
    9. Moonsoo Kang & K. G. Viswanathan & Nancy A. White & Edward J. Zychowicz, 2022. "Sustainability Efforts, Index Recognition, and Stock Performance," Springer Books, in: Marielle de Jong & Dan diBartolomeo (ed.), Risks Related to Environmental, Social and Governmental Issues (ESG), pages 45-57, Springer.
    10. Mustafa K. Yilmaz & Mine Aksoy & Ekrem Tatoglu, 2020. "Does the Stock Market Value Inclusion in a Sustainability Index? Evidence from Borsa Istanbul," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-22, January.
    11. Akhtar Ali & Imran Abbas Jadoon, 2022. "The Value Relevance of Corporate Sustainability Performance (CSP)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-31, July.
    12. Federica Ielasi & Monica Rossolini, 2019. "Responsible or Thematic? The True Nature of Sustainability-Themed Mutual Funds," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-17, June.
    13. Gbenga Ibikunle & Tom Steffen, 2017. "European Green Mutual Fund Performance: A Comparative Analysis with their Conventional and Black Peers," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 145(2), pages 337-355, October.
    14. Martijn Boermans & Rients Galema, 2017. "Pension funds carbon footprint and investment trade-offs," DNB Working Papers 554, Netherlands Central Bank, Research Department.
    15. K. Liagkouras & K. Metaxiotis & G. Tsihrintzis, 2022. "Incorporating environmental and social considerations into the portfolio optimization process," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 316(2), pages 1493-1518, September.
    16. Paolo Capelli & Federica Ielasi & Angeloantonio Russo, 2021. "Forecasting volatility by integrating financial risk with environmental, social, and governance risk," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(5), pages 1483-1495, September.
    17. Capelle-Blancard, Gunther & Crifo, Patricia & Diaye, Marc-Arthur & Oueghlissi, Rim & Scholtens, Bert, 2019. "Sovereign bond yield spreads and sustainability: An empirical analysis of OECD countries," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 156-169.
    18. Boermans, Martijn A. & Galema, Rients, 2019. "Are pension funds actively decarbonizing their portfolios?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 50-60.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jsustf:v:2:y:2012:i:3-4:p:338-375. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/TSFI20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.