IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jsustf/v12y2022i1p87-102.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding the implications of FinTech Peer-to-Peer (P2P) lending during the COVID-19 pandemic

Author

Listed:
  • Khakan Najaf
  • Ravichandran K. Subramaniam
  • Osama F. Atayah

Abstract

This study examines the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the determinants of FinTech Peer-to-Peer (P2P) lending. The issue is significant because P2P lending platforms have attracted borrowers with little to no access to the credit facilities offered by conventional banks during the pandemic. Although many banks and financial institutions have offered online loan application services during the COVID-19 pandemic, few have developed verification of loan applications submitted online. The results of this study show that the COVID-19 has brought a drastic change in the key determinants of P2P lending. The results imply that FinTech P2P lending has become the most viable alternative credit option available to borrowers. The findings are significant and likely to be of interest to borrowers, investors, practitioners, academics, and policymakers because they highlight the usefulness of P2P lending platforms and their potential to augment or replace lending provided by traditional or conventional banking institutions.

Suggested Citation

  • Khakan Najaf & Ravichandran K. Subramaniam & Osama F. Atayah, 2022. "Understanding the implications of FinTech Peer-to-Peer (P2P) lending during the COVID-19 pandemic," Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(1), pages 87-102, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:jsustf:v:12:y:2022:i:1:p:87-102
    DOI: 10.1080/20430795.2021.1917225
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/20430795.2021.1917225
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/20430795.2021.1917225?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Barbara Będowska-Sójka & Agata Kliber & Laivi Laidroo, 2023. "Has the pandemic changed the relationships between fintechs and banks?," Operations Research and Decisions, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Management, vol. 33(4), pages 15-33.
    2. Husam Rjoub & Tomiwa Sunday Adebayo & Dervis Kirikkaleli, 2023. "Blockchain technology-based FinTech banking sector involvement using adaptive neuro-fuzzy-based K-nearest neighbors algorithm," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 9(1), pages 1-23, December.
    3. Xin Li & Xiujuan Tian, 2022. "Research on SMEs’ Reputation Mechanism and Default Risk Based on Investors’ Financial Participation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-17, November.
    4. Avani Raval & Rajesh Desai, 2024. "Reviews and directions of FinTech research: bibliometric–content analysis approach," Journal of Financial Services Marketing, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 29(3), pages 1115-1134, September.
    5. Onorato, Grazia & Pampurini, Francesca & Quaranta, Anna Grazia, 2024. "Lending activity efficiency. A comparison between fintech firms and the banking sector," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    6. Ya-Chih Yang & Wu-Po Liu & Kung-Hong Shih, 2023. "The COVID-19 pandemic and firm value: the mediating effect of FinTech applications," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 60(1), pages 329-344, January.
    7. Marten Risius & Christoph F. Breidbach & Mathieu Chanson & Ruben Krannichfeldt & Felix Wortmann, 2023. "On the performance of blockchain-based token offerings," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 33(1), pages 1-19, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jsustf:v:12:y:2022:i:1:p:87-102. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/TSFI20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.