IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jpropr/v17y2000i4p339-352.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Convergence of the land tenure systems of China, Hong Kong and Taiwan?

Author

Listed:
  • L.H. Li
  • K.G. McKinnell
  • A. Walker

Abstract

The combined economies of China, Hong Kong and Taiwan, referred to collectively as Greater China, are forecast to equal that of the USA by 2002. Land development has played a significant part in this growth in Hong Kong and Taiwan and is doing so increasingly in China as opportunities are taken as a result of land reform. As they continue to converge both economically and politically, the apparent disparity of their land tenure systems may inhibit this process. This paper examines the common roots of their land tenure systems and the divergences which have occurred during the last two centuries. In tracing these roots it focuses on the major evolution during this century when the communists and nationalists split to form the People's Republic of China and the Republic of China respectively whilst Hong Kong continued to be administered by Britain. It identifies the major land tenure reforms which have occurred and argues that the apparent differences in land tenure systems are not substantive due to all three systems being founded on a common history and with philosophical developments which are compatible but one in which Britain's position seems somewhat ironic.

Suggested Citation

  • L.H. Li & K.G. McKinnell & A. Walker, 2000. "Convergence of the land tenure systems of China, Hong Kong and Taiwan?," Journal of Property Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(4), pages 339-352.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jpropr:v:17:y:2000:i:4:p:339-352
    DOI: 10.1080/09599910010001439
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09599910010001439
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09599910010001439?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cheonjae Lee & Walter Timo de Vries & Uchendu Eugene Chigbu, 2019. "Land Governance Re-Arrangements: The One-Country One-System (OCOS) Versus One-Country Two-System (OCTS) Approach," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-26, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jpropr:v:17:y:2000:i:4:p:339-352. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RJPR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.