IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jnlasa/v116y2021i534p798-804.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Inference on a New Class of Sample Average Treatment Effects

Author

Listed:
  • Jasjeet S. Sekhon
  • Yotam Shem-Tov

Abstract

We derive new variance formulas for inference on a general class of estimands of causal average treatment effects in a randomized control trial. We generalize the seminal work of Robins and show that when the researcher’s objective is inference on sample average treatment effect of the treated (SATT), a consistent variance estimator exists. Although this estimand is equal to the sample average treatment effect (SATE) in expectation, potentially large differences in both accuracy and coverage can occur by the change of estimand, even asymptotically. Inference on SATE, even using a conservative confidence interval, provides incorrect coverage of SATT. We demonstrate the applicability of the new theoretical results using an empirical application with hundreds of online experiments with an average sample size of approximately 100 million observations per experiment. An R package, estCI, that implements all the proposed estimation procedures is available. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.

Suggested Citation

  • Jasjeet S. Sekhon & Yotam Shem-Tov, 2021. "Inference on a New Class of Sample Average Treatment Effects," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 116(534), pages 798-804, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jnlasa:v:116:y:2021:i:534:p:798-804
    DOI: 10.1080/01621459.2020.1730854
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01621459.2020.1730854
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01621459.2020.1730854?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dennis Shen & Peng Ding & Jasjeet Sekhon & Bin Yu, 2023. "Same Root Different Leaves: Time Series and Cross‐Sectional Methods in Panel Data," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 91(6), pages 2125-2154, November.
    2. Gabriel Okasa, 2022. "Meta-Learners for Estimation of Causal Effects: Finite Sample Cross-Fit Performance," Papers 2201.12692, arXiv.org.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jnlasa:v:116:y:2021:i:534:p:798-804. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/UASA20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.