IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jnlasa/v115y2020i529p138-151.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

From Fixed-X to Random-X Regression: Bias-Variance Decompositions, Covariance Penalties, and Prediction Error Estimation

Author

Listed:
  • Saharon Rosset
  • Ryan J. Tibshirani

Abstract

In statistical prediction, classical approaches for model selection and model evaluation based on covariance penalties are still widely used. Most of the literature on this topic is based on what we call the “Fixed-X” assumption, where covariate values are assumed to be nonrandom. By contrast, it is often more reasonable to take a “Random-X” view, where the covariate values are independently drawn for both training and prediction. To study the applicability of covariance penalties in this setting, we propose a decomposition of Random-X prediction error in which the randomness in the covariates contributes to both the bias and variance components. This decomposition is general, but we concentrate on the fundamental case of ordinary least-squares (OLS) regression. We prove that in this setting the move from Fixed-X to Random-X prediction results in an increase in both bias and variance. When the covariates are normally distributed and the linear model is unbiased, all terms in this decomposition are explicitly computable, which yields an extension of Mallows’ Cp that we call RCp. RCp also holds asymptotically for certain classes of nonnormal covariates. When the noise variance is unknown, plugging in the usual unbiased estimate leads to an approach that we call RCp ^$\widehat{{\rm RCp}}$, which is closely related to Sp, and generalized cross-validation (GCV). For excess bias, we propose an estimate based on the “shortcut-formula” for ordinary cross-validation (OCV), resulting in an approach we call RCp+. Theoretical arguments and numerical simulations suggest that RCp+ is typically superior to OCV, though the difference is small. We further examine the Random-X error of other popular estimators. The surprising result we get for ridge regression is that, in the heavily regularized regime, Random-X variance is smaller than Fixed-X variance, which can lead to smaller overall Random-X error. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.

Suggested Citation

  • Saharon Rosset & Ryan J. Tibshirani, 2020. "From Fixed-X to Random-X Regression: Bias-Variance Decompositions, Covariance Penalties, and Prediction Error Estimation," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 115(529), pages 138-151, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jnlasa:v:115:y:2020:i:529:p:138-151
    DOI: 10.1080/01621459.2018.1424632
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01621459.2018.1424632
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01621459.2018.1424632?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bradley Efron, 2021. "Resampling Plans and the Estimation of Prediction Error," Stats, MDPI, vol. 4(4), pages 1-25, December.
    2. DelSole, Timothy & Tippett, Michael K., 2021. "Correcting the corrected AIC," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jnlasa:v:115:y:2020:i:529:p:138-151. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/UASA20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.