IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jnlasa/v114y2019i525p1-19.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Penalized Spline of Propensity Methods for Treatment Comparison

Author

Listed:
  • Tingting Zhou
  • Michael R. Elliott
  • Roderick J. A. Little

Abstract

Valid causal inference from observational studies requires controlling for confounders. When time-dependent confounders are present that serve as mediators of treatment effects and affect future treatment assignment, standard regression methods for controlling for confounders fail. Similar issues also arise in trials with sequential randomization, when randomization at later time points is based on intermediate outcomes from earlier randomized assignments. We propose a robust multiple imputation-based approach to causal inference in this setting called penalized spline of propensity methods for treatment comparison (PENCOMP), which builds on the penalized spline of propensity prediction method for missing data problems. PENCOMP estimates causal effects by imputing missing potential outcomes with flexible spline models and draws inference based on imputed and observed outcomes. Under the SUTVA, positivity, and ignorability assumptions, PENCOMP has a double robustness property for causal effects. Simulations suggest that it tends to outperform doubly robust marginal structural modeling when the weights are variable. We apply our method to the multicenter AIDS cohort study to estimate the effect of antiretroviral treatment on CD4 counts in HIV-infected patients. Supplementary materials for this article are available online. Code submitted with this article was checked by an Associate Editor for Reproducibility and is available as an online supplement.

Suggested Citation

  • Tingting Zhou & Michael R. Elliott & Roderick J. A. Little, 2019. "Penalized Spline of Propensity Methods for Treatment Comparison," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 114(525), pages 1-19, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jnlasa:v:114:y:2019:i:525:p:1-19
    DOI: 10.1080/01621459.2018.1518234
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01621459.2018.1518234
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01621459.2018.1518234?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Brian J. Reich & Shu Yang & Yawen Guan, 2022. "Discussion on “Spatial+: A novel approach to spatial confounding” by Dupont, Wood, and Augustin," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 78(4), pages 1291-1294, December.
    2. Ao Yuan & Anqi Yin & Ming T. Tan, 2021. "Enhanced Doubly Robust Procedure for Causal Inference," Statistics in Biosciences, Springer;International Chinese Statistical Association, vol. 13(3), pages 454-478, December.
    3. Ray Chambers & Setareh Ranjbar & Nicola Salvati & Barbara Pacini, 2022. "Weighting, informativeness and causal inference, with an application to rainfall enhancement," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 185(4), pages 1584-1612, October.
    4. Tingting Zhou & Michael R. Elliott & Roderick J. A. Little, 2021. "Robust Causal Estimation from Observational Studies Using Penalized Spline of Propensity Score for Treatment Comparison," Stats, MDPI, vol. 4(2), pages 1-21, June.
    5. Davide Viviano & Jelena Bradic, 2021. "Dynamic covariate balancing: estimating treatment effects over time with potential local projections," Papers 2103.01280, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2024.
    6. Antonio R. Linero, 2023. "Prior and posterior checking of implicit causal assumptions," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(4), pages 3153-3164, December.
    7. Tingting Zhou & Michael R. Elliott & Roderick J. A. Little, 2022. "Addressing Disparities in the Propensity Score Distributions for Treatment Comparisons from Observational Studies," Stats, MDPI, vol. 5(4), pages 1-17, December.
    8. Maria Josefsson & Michael J. Daniels, 2021. "Bayesian semi‐parametric G‐computation for causal inference in a cohort study with MNAR dropout and death," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 70(2), pages 398-414, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jnlasa:v:114:y:2019:i:525:p:1-19. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/UASA20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.