IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jnlasa/v109y2014i505p1-10.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bayesian Models for Multiple Outcomes in Domains With Application to the Seychelles Child Development Study

Author

Listed:
  • Luo Xiao
  • Sally W. Thurston
  • David Ruppert
  • Tanzy M. T. Love
  • Philip W. Davidson

Abstract

The Seychelles Child Development Study (SCDS) examines the effects of prenatal exposure to methylmercury on the functioning of the central nervous system. The SCDS data include 20 outcomes measured on 9-year-old children that can be classified broadly in four outcome classes or "domains": cognition, memory, motor, and social behavior. Previous analyses and scientific theory suggest that these outcomes may belong to more than one of these domains, rather than only a single domain as is frequently assumed for modeling. We present a framework for examining the effects of exposure and other covariates when the outcomes may each belong to more than one domain and where we also want to learn about the assignment of outcomes to domains. Each domain is defined by a sentinel outcome, which is preassigned to that domain only. All other outcomes can belong to multiple domains and are not preassigned. Our model allows exposure and covariate effects to differ across domains and across outcomes within domains, and includes random subject-specific effects that model correlations between outcomes within and across domains. We take a Bayesian MCMC approach. Results from the Seychelles study and from extensive simulations show that our model can effectively determine sparse domain assignment, and at the same time give increased power to detect overall, domain-specific, and outcome-specific exposure and covariate effects relative to separate models for each endpoint. When fit to the Seychelles data, several outcomes were classified as partly belonging to domains other than their originally assigned domains. In retrospect, the new partial domain assignments are reasonable and, as we discuss, suggest important scientific insights about the nature of the outcomes. Checks of model misspecification were improved relative to a model that assumes each outcome is in a single domain. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.

Suggested Citation

  • Luo Xiao & Sally W. Thurston & David Ruppert & Tanzy M. T. Love & Philip W. Davidson, 2014. "Bayesian Models for Multiple Outcomes in Domains With Application to the Seychelles Child Development Study," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 109(505), pages 1-10, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:jnlasa:v:109:y:2014:i:505:p:1-10
    DOI: 10.1080/01621459.2013.830070
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01621459.2013.830070
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01621459.2013.830070?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alexis E. Zavez & Emeir M. McSorley & Alison J. Yeates & Sally W. Thurston, 2023. "A Bayesian Partial Membership Model for Multiple Exposures with Uncertain Group Memberships," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 28(3), pages 377-400, September.
    2. Amy LaLonde & Tanzy Love & Sally W. Thurston & Philip W. Davidson, 2020. "Discovering structure in multiple outcomes models for tests of childhood neurodevelopment," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 76(3), pages 874-885, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jnlasa:v:109:y:2014:i:505:p:1-10. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/UASA20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.