IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jmkthe/v34y2024i2p584-601.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Are university ranking and popularity related? An analysis of 500 universities in Google Trends and the QS ranking in 2012-2020

Author

Listed:
  • Krzysztof Rybiński
  • Andrzej Wodecki

Abstract

Universities face tough choices about how to allocate tight budgets. A frequent question is whether a significant investment in research that is crucial for the university’s position in rankings will make the university more popular and lead to higher revenues from tuition. This paper analyses how the ranking and popularity of universities are related by examining changes in the QS ranking scores and the Google Search Volume Indexes. The analysis conducted for 2012–2020 for the top 500 universities revealed a positive relationship between the two variables. This relationship is statistically robust in both the ordinary least squares (OLS) and quantile regressions. However, it does not hold when the changes in ranking are small, nor in the short run. Finally, and unexpectedly, the results presented favour more investment by universities in humanities rather than in engineering and technology.

Suggested Citation

  • Krzysztof Rybiński & Andrzej Wodecki, 2024. "Are university ranking and popularity related? An analysis of 500 universities in Google Trends and the QS ranking in 2012-2020," Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(2), pages 584-601, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:jmkthe:v:34:y:2024:i:2:p:584-601
    DOI: 10.1080/08841241.2022.2049952
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/08841241.2022.2049952
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/08841241.2022.2049952?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jmkthe:v:34:y:2024:i:2:p:584-601. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/WMHE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.