IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jitecd/v30y2021i1p47-67.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What are the drivers of shadow economy? A further evidence of economic integration and institutional quality

Author

Listed:
  • Phuc Nguyen Canh
  • Christophe Schinckus
  • Su Dinh Thanh

Abstract

This article uses panel-corrected standard errors (PCSE) estimator and dynamic fixed effects autoregressive distributed lag (DFE ARDL) estimator to examine the influence of the institutional quality and economic integration on shadow economy for a global sample of 112 economies (between 2005 and 2015). Our empirical research shows that the inward foreign direct investment (FDI), trade openness, institutional quality, and shadow economy have bi-causal relationships. Notably, the results show a strong negative impact of institutional quality and FDI inflows but a weaker negative influence of trade openness on shadow economy. There is also long-run cointegration between institutional quality, economic integration with shadow economy, and heteroscedastic effects of these factors in short run- and long run. Especially, trade openness has a negative impact in both short run and long run, while FDI inflows have a negative influence in the short run but it is positive in the long run. Interestingly, the influence of the institutional quality is quite heterogeneous since the control of corruption and the rule of law have a significant negative impact in the short run, while the political stability has significant negative impact in the long run.

Suggested Citation

  • Phuc Nguyen Canh & Christophe Schinckus & Su Dinh Thanh, 2021. "What are the drivers of shadow economy? A further evidence of economic integration and institutional quality," The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(1), pages 47-67, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:jitecd:v:30:y:2021:i:1:p:47-67
    DOI: 10.1080/09638199.2020.1799428
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09638199.2020.1799428
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09638199.2020.1799428?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Samar F. Abou Ltaif & Simona Mihai-Yiannaki & Alkis Thrassou, 2024. "Lebanon’s Economic Development Risk: Global Factors and Local Realities of the Shadow Economy Amid Financial Crisis," Risks, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-21, July.
    2. Canh Phuc Nguyen & Binh Nguyen Quang & Thanh Dinh Su, 2023. "Institutional frameworks and the shadow economy: new evidence of colonial history, socialist history, religion, and legal systems," Economia e Politica Industriale: Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, Springer;Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale, vol. 50(3), pages 647-675, September.
    3. Colin C. Williams, 2023. "A Modern Guide to the Informal Economy," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 18668.
    4. Segun Thompson Bolarinwa & Munacinga Simatele, 2024. "Asymmetric Analysis of Causal Relations in the Informality–Globalisation Nexus in Africa," Economies, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-25, June.
    5. Paraskevi Koufopoulou & Colin C. Williams & Athanassios Vozikis & Kyriakos Souliotis & Antonios Samprakos, 2021. "Estimating Shadow Economy Size in Greece 2000 - 2018: A Flexible MIMIC Approach," SPOUDAI Journal of Economics and Business, SPOUDAI Journal of Economics and Business, University of Piraeus, vol. 71(3-4), pages 23-47, July-Dece.
    6. Nguyen, Canh Phuc, 2022. "Does economic complexity matter for the shadow economy?," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 210-227.
    7. Aziz N. Berdiev & Brandon Gomes & James W. Saunoris, 2023. "Revisiting the nexus between globalisation and the shadow economy: Untying the influences of de jure versus de facto globalisation," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(1), pages 27-54, January.
    8. Sèna Kimm Gnangnon, 2022. "Do Aid for Trade Flows Help Reduce the Shadow Economy in Recipient Countries?," Economies, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-33, December.
    9. Korhan K. Gokmenoglu & Aysel Amir, 2023. "Investigating the Determinants of the Shadow Economy: The Baltic Region," Eastern European Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 61(2), pages 181-198, March.
    10. Salinas, Aldo & Ortiz, Cristian & Changoluisa, Javier & Muffatto, Moreno, 2023. "Testing three views about the determinants of informal economy: New evidence at global level and by country groups using the CS-ARDL approach," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 438-455.
    11. Ting Xu & Zhike Lv, 2023. "The effect of tourism on the shadow economy: The level of economic development is key," Tourism Economics, , vol. 29(8), pages 2129-2142, December.
    12. Ha, Le Thanh & Dung, Hoang Phuong & Thanh, To Trung, 2021. "Economic complexity and shadow economy: A multi-dimensional analysis," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 408-422.
    13. Ioana Alexandra Horodnic & Colin Charles Williams & Jan Windebank & Adriana Zaiț & Claudia Ioana Ciobanu, 2021. "Explaining consumer motives to purchase in the informal economy," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(10), pages 1-22, October.
    14. Canh Phuc Nguyen & Binh Quang Nguyen, 2023. "Does the shadow economy matter for tourism consumption? New global evidence," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 65(2), pages 729-773, August.
    15. Isaac Ketu & Arsene Mouongue Kelly & Jules-Eric Tchapchet Tchouto, 2024. "Does economic complexity reduce the size of the shadow economy in African countries?," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 4(1), pages 1-27, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jitecd:v:30:y:2021:i:1:p:47-67. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RJTE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.