IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jenpmg/v57y2014i11p1724-1745.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Management of natural resources in a conflicting environment in Ghana: unmasking a messy policy problem

Author

Listed:
  • Frederick A. Armah
  • Isaac Luginaah
  • Genesis T. Yengoh
  • Joseph Taabazuing
  • David O. Yawson

Abstract

Resource use conflict is an enduring problem for science and policy making. Using in-depth interviews and focus group discussions with resource users, policy makers and key informants, we explored four case examples of resource use conflict within lands and forestry, fisheries, oil and the mining sectors in Ghana. Results indicate that resource use conflict consists of a complex, non-linear system of balancing and reinforcing feedback loops that recur across resource sectors. The conflicts are difficult to clearly define, have many interdependencies and are multi-causal. Specifically, dysfunctional policy, commoditisation of land, infringement on rights of users, shift from communal to private land ownership, renegotiation of rights, and unclear roles and responsibilities of government agencies, exacerbate conflicts among resource users, managers and policy makers in Ghana. In addition, supranational policy such as the protocol of the Economic Community of West African States, which promotes free movement of people and goods within the 16-nation community, is a driver of conflict between native farmers and nomadic Fulani herders. Clear policy directions from government that outlines the specific roles of various departments involved in resource issues together with a holistic community participatory approach is therefore required to comprehensively understand and address such conflicts.

Suggested Citation

  • Frederick A. Armah & Isaac Luginaah & Genesis T. Yengoh & Joseph Taabazuing & David O. Yawson, 2014. "Management of natural resources in a conflicting environment in Ghana: unmasking a messy policy problem," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(11), pages 1724-1745, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jenpmg:v:57:y:2014:i:11:p:1724-1745
    DOI: 10.1080/09640568.2013.834247
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09640568.2013.834247
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09640568.2013.834247?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bonye, Samuel Ziem & Yiridomoh, Gordon Yenglier & Nsiah, Vivian, 2023. "Our forest, our livelihood: Natural resources’ use controversies and community livelihood sustainability in the Mole National Park, Ghana," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    2. Opoku Adabor & Emmanuel Buabeng & Raoul Fani Djomo Choumbou, 2021. "Asymmetrical effect of oil and gas resource rent on economic growth: Empirical evidence from Ghana," Cogent Economics & Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(1), pages 1971355-197, January.
    3. Peter A. Y. Ampim & Michael Ogbe & Eric Obeng & Edwin K. Akley & Dilys S. MacCarthy, 2021. "Land Cover Changes in Ghana over the Past 24 Years," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-23, April.
    4. Kansanga, Moses Mosonsieyiri & Luginaah, Isaac, 2019. "Agrarian livelihoods under siege: Carbon forestry, tenure constraints and the rise of capitalist forest enclosures in Ghana," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 131-142.
    5. Osei-Kojo, Alex & Bobbie, Lord Horlali & Andrews, Nathan & Wilkerson, Alex Dylan & Adams, Ellis Adjei & Leech, Nancy, 2024. "The state of research on Ghana’s oil and gas resources: Themes and future directions," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jenpmg:v:57:y:2014:i:11:p:1724-1745. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CJEP20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.