IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jenpmg/v56y2013i4p572-587.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Vale Landcare: the rise and decline of community-based natural resource management in rural Australia

Author

Listed:
  • Rebeka Tennent
  • Stewart Lockie

Abstract

For almost two decades, community Landcare groups and supporting institutional bodies were the focus of agri-environmental policy in Australia. Despite the successes of Landcare, the programme faces challenges securing funding in an era of agri-environmental policy that preferences economic mechanisms, such as market-based instruments, for devolving funding. This longitudinal study examines how Landcare group activity and membership in one catchment have changed over the last decade. Community Landcare groups in the study area were in ‘sleeper mode’ or had ceased to exist, partially as a result of funding and structural arrangements and several other factors that undermined both community Landcare groups and the regional Landcare network.

Suggested Citation

  • Rebeka Tennent & Stewart Lockie, 2013. "Vale Landcare: the rise and decline of community-based natural resource management in rural Australia," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(4), pages 572-587, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:jenpmg:v:56:y:2013:i:4:p:572-587
    DOI: 10.1080/09640568.2012.689617
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09640568.2012.689617
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09640568.2012.689617?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Royal, Tessa, 2021. "Private land conservation policy in Australia: Minimising social-ecological trade-offs raised by market-based policy instruments," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    2. Malin Song & Shuhong Wang & Kaiya Wu, 2018. "Environment-biased technological progress and industrial land-use efficiency in China’s new normal," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 268(1), pages 425-440, September.
    3. Song, Malin & Cui, Xin & Wang, Shuhong, 2019. "Simulation of land green supply chain based on system dynamics and policy optimization," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 317-327.
    4. Pornsiri Cheevapattananuwong & Claudia Baldwin & Athena Lathouras & Nnenna Ike, 2020. "Social Capital in Community Organizing for Land Protection and Food Security," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-19, February.
    5. Sergei Schaub & Jaboury Ghazoul & Robert Huber & Wei Zhang & Adelaide Sander & Charles Rees & Simanti Banerjee & Robert Finger, 2023. "The role of behavioural factors and opportunity costs in farmers' participation in voluntary agri‐environmental schemes: A systematic review," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 74(3), pages 617-660, September.
    6. Bardsley, Douglas K. & Palazzo, Elisa & Stringer, Randy, 2019. "What should we conserve? Farmer narratives on biodiversity values in the McLaren Vale, South Australia," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 594-605.
    7. Kanowski, Peter J., 2017. "Australia's forests: Contested past, tenure-driven present, uncertain future," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 56-68.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jenpmg:v:56:y:2013:i:4:p:572-587. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CJEP20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.