IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jenpmg/v55y2012i4p469-485.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social context and the role of collaborative policy making for private land conservation

Author

Listed:
  • Benjamin Cooke
  • William T. Langford
  • Ascelin Gordon
  • Sarah Bekessy

Abstract

Recent decades have seen a proliferation of conservation programmes designed to encourage private landholders to protect and enhance biodiversity on their land. This paper reviews research emphasising the role of social context in shaping private land conservation (PLC) outcomes. We examine the potential for a collaborative policy-making process incorporating design and implementation of PLC programmes to reduce conflict between conservation agencies and landholders and increase community consensus around PLC issues. Collaborative partnerships nested at the sub-watershed governance level may represent the most appropriate geographic scale for engaging community interest, whilst linking PLC efforts to higher-level institutional frameworks.

Suggested Citation

  • Benjamin Cooke & William T. Langford & Ascelin Gordon & Sarah Bekessy, 2012. "Social context and the role of collaborative policy making for private land conservation," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(4), pages 469-485, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:jenpmg:v:55:y:2012:i:4:p:469-485
    DOI: 10.1080/09640568.2011.608549
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09640568.2011.608549
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09640568.2011.608549?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Royal, Tessa, 2021. "Private land conservation policy in Australia: Minimising social-ecological trade-offs raised by market-based policy instruments," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    2. Di Lucia, Lorenzo & Usai, Domenico & Woods, Jeremy, 2018. "Designing landscapes for sustainable outcomes – The case of advanced biofuels," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 434-446.
    3. Cooke, Benjamin & Corbo-Perkins, Gabriella, 2018. "Co-opting and resisting market based instruments for private land conservation," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 172-181.
    4. Cortés-Capano, Gonzalo & Hanley, Nick & Sheremet, Oleg & Hausmann, Anna & Toivonen, Tuuli & Garibotto-Carton, Gustavo & Soutullo, Alvaro & Di Minin, Enrico, 2021. "Assessing landowners’ preferences to inform voluntary private land conservation: The role of non-monetary incentives," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    5. Sathishkumar Samiappan & Andrew Shamaskin & Jiangdong Liu & Jennifer Roberts & Anna Linhoss & Kristine Evans, 2019. "Land Conservation in the Gulf of Mexico Region: A Comprehensive Review of Plans, Priorities, and Efforts," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-19, May.
    6. Baltiņa Līga, 2014. "A Place-Based Approach in EU Regional Development and Its Application in Latvia," TalTech Journal of European Studies, Sciendo, vol. 4(1), pages 34-53, June.
    7. Hayley S. Clements & Matthew J. Selinske & Carla L. Archibald & Benjamin Cooke & James A. Fitzsimons & Julie E. Groce & Nooshin Torabi & Mathew J. Hardy, 2018. "Fairness and Transparency Are Required for the Inclusion of Privately Protected Areas in Publicly Accessible Conservation Databases," Land, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-13, August.
    8. Bircol, Guilherme Augusto Carminato & Souza, Marcelo Pereira de & Fontes, Aurélio Teodoro & Chiarello, Adriano Garcia & Ranieri, Victor Eduardo Lima, 2018. "Planning by the rules: A fair chance for the environment in a land-use conflict area," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 103-112.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jenpmg:v:55:y:2012:i:4:p:469-485. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CJEP20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.