IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jecmet/v3y1996i2p261-284.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Towards a methodology of tendencies

Author

Listed:
  • Piet-Hein van Eeghen

Abstract

The paper attempts to think through some aspects of a methodology for tendencies, taking Menger as an important source of inspiration. The contrast between laws and tendencies is emphasized, whereby laws posit necessary connections between cause and effect and refer to historically specific events and tendencies describe loose connections between cause and effect and refer to broad Hayekian patterns of events. Emphasis is placed on the importance of isolating as well as 'patterning' abstraction for the social sciences, which is traced back to Menger. The implications for method of these two forms of abstraction are elaborated. Some topical controversies are discussed along the way, such as the rigour/relevance dilemma, the realisticness of the rationality principle and the intra-Austrian dispute between the radical subjectivists and the 'middle grounders'. The use and importance of an Aristotelian ontology, prevalent in Menger, is discussed as well.

Suggested Citation

  • Piet-Hein van Eeghen, 1996. "Towards a methodology of tendencies," Journal of Economic Methodology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(2), pages 261-284.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:jecmet:v:3:y:1996:i:2:p:261-284
    DOI: 10.1080/13501789600000018
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13501789600000018
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13501789600000018?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Charles M.A. Clark, 1992. "Economic Theory And Natural Philosophy," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 89.
    2. Thomas Mayer, 1992. "Truth versus precision in economics," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 307.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. José Luís Cardoso, 2015. "Liberalism and enlightened political economy," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(6), pages 934-948, December.
    2. Clive Beed & Cara Beed, 1996. "Polarities between Naturalism and Non-Naturalism in Contemporary Economics: An Overview," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(4), pages 1077-1104, December.
    3. Drakopoulos, S. A., 1997. "Origins and Development of the Trend Toward Value-Free Economics," Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Cambridge University Press, vol. 19(2), pages 286-300, October.
    4. Kevin D. Hoover & Stephen J. Perez, 1999. "Data mining reconsidered: encompassing and the general-to-specific approach to specification search," Econometrics Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 2(2), pages 167-191.
    5. Charles M. A. Clark & Aleksandr V. Gevorkyan, 2020. "Artificial Intelligence and Human Flourishing," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 79(4), pages 1307-1344, September.
    6. Michel, DE VROEY, 2007. "Marshallian and Walrasian Theory, Complementary or Alternative Approaches ? The Views in Presence," Discussion Papers (ECON - Département des Sciences Economiques) 2007002, Université catholique de Louvain, Département des Sciences Economiques.
    7. Charles M. A. Clark, 2021. "Development Policy and the Poor, Part 2: Preferential Option for the Poor," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 80(4), pages 1131-1154, September.
    8. Kakarot-Handtke, Egmont, 2010. "Axiomatic Basics of e-Economics," MPRA Paper 24331, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Bruno Frey, 2002. "Why economists disregard economic methodology," Journal of Economic Methodology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(1), pages 41-47.
    10. Ötsch, Walter, 2020. "Imagination und Bildlichkeit in der Geschichte der Wirtschaftstheorie: Von Adam Smith bis zur frühen Neoklassik," Working Paper Serie des Instituts für Ökonomie 63, Hochschule für Gesellschaftsgestaltung (HfGG), Institut für Ökonomie.
    11. Ötsch, Walter Otto, 2015. "Ökonomie und Moral: Eine kurze Theoriegeschichte," Working Paper Serie des Instituts für Ökonomie Ök-07, Hochschule für Gesellschaftsgestaltung (HfGG), Institut für Ökonomie.
    12. Ötsch, Walter, 2018. "Bilder in der Geschichte der Ökonomie: Das Beispiel der Metapher von der Wirtschaft als Maschine," Working Paper Serie des Instituts für Ökonomie Ök-42, Hochschule für Gesellschaftsgestaltung (HfGG), Institut für Ökonomie.
    13. Malcom Rutherford, 1999. "Institutionalism as "Scientific" Economics," Department Discussion Papers 9901, Department of Economics, University of Victoria.
    14. Charles M. A. Clark, 2009. "A Christian Perspective of the Current Economic Crisis," The American Economist, Sage Publications, vol. 53(1), pages 16-27, March.
    15. T. Hutchison & I. Pellengahr & K. Podczeck & R. Noll & I. Vogelsang & B. Mitchell & S. Martin & J. Mairesse, 1994. "Book review," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 59(3), pages 325-349, October.
    16. Charles M. A. Clark, 1993. "Spontaneous Order versus Instituted Process: The Market as Cause and Effect," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(2), pages 373-385, June.
    17. Ötsch, Walter, 2016. "Imaginative Grundlagen bei Adam Smith: Aspekte von Bildlichkeit und ihrem Verlust in der Geschichte der Ökonomie," Working Paper Serie des Instituts für Ökonomie Ök-19, Hochschule für Gesellschaftsgestaltung (HfGG), Institut für Ökonomie.
    18. Piotr Ciżkowicz & Marcin Hołda & Andrzej Rzońca, 2009. "Inflation and investment in monetary growth models," Bank i Kredyt, Narodowy Bank Polski, vol. 40(6), pages 9-40.
    19. Eileen Norcross & Paul Dragos Aligica, 2020. "Catholic Social Thought and New Institutional Economics: An Assessment of Their Affinities and Areas of Potential Convergence," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 79(4), pages 1241-1269, September.
    20. Mark R. Greer, 1999. "Assessing the Soothsayers: An Examination of the Track Record of Macroeconomic Forecasting," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(1), pages 77-94, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jecmet:v:3:y:1996:i:2:p:261-284. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RJEC20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.