IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/intgms/v16y2016i3p373-390.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The family exclusion order as a harm-minimisation measure for casino gambling: the case of Singapore

Author

Listed:
  • Esther C. L. Goh
  • Vincent Ng
  • Brenda S. A. Yeoh

Abstract

Singapore is one of the first jurisdictions in the world that has implemented a harm minimization model based on third party exclusion known as the Family Exclusion Order (FEO). Unlike other forms of third party exclusion practiced in other countries, family members in Singapore are able to apply for FEOs to prevent a gambler from entering the casinos, if the family has experienced harm caused by his/her gambling. In this study, 105 applicants for the FEO were sampled from all successful FEOs granted within a five-year period. Using a qualitative approach, this study attempts to illuminate the intricate issues experienced by family members that provided the impetus for them to apply for the FEO. While the extant literature posits self-exclusion as a superior tool of restraint as it involves the gambler’s personal motivation to curb gambling, this paper reports initial evidence of benefits resulting from family-imposed restraints from the perspective of family members. In particular, positive ratings of the FEO stemmed from a sense of relief experienced by mother and wife applicants. Possible reasons behind these positive outcomes are explicated using intrinsic motivation theory, with sensitivity to gender relations within the family.

Suggested Citation

  • Esther C. L. Goh & Vincent Ng & Brenda S. A. Yeoh, 2016. "The family exclusion order as a harm-minimisation measure for casino gambling: the case of Singapore," International Gambling Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(3), pages 373-390, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:intgms:v:16:y:2016:i:3:p:373-390
    DOI: 10.1080/14459795.2016.1211169
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14459795.2016.1211169
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14459795.2016.1211169?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alex Blaszczynski & Robert Ladouceur & Lia Nower, 2007. "Self-exclusion: A Proposed Gateway to Treatment Model," International Gambling Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(1), pages 59-71.
    2. Ruth Grant Kalischuk & Nadine Nowatzki & Kelly Cardwell & Kurt Klein & Jason Solowoniuk, 2006. "Problem Gambling and its Impact on Families: A Literature Review," International Gambling Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(1), pages 31-60, June.
    3. Mathew Mathews & Rachel Volberg, 2013. "Impact of problem gambling on financial, emotional and social well-being of Singaporean families," International Gambling Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(1), pages 127-140, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tiffany Cheng-Han Leung & Robin Stanley Snell, 2021. "Strategies for Social and Environmental Disclosure: The Case of Multinational Gambling Companies," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 168(3), pages 447-467, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Isaac Koomson & Sefa Awaworyi Churchill & Musharavati Ephraim Munyanyi, 2022. "Gambling and Financial Stress," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 163(1), pages 473-503, August.
    2. Suomi, Aino & Bailey, Megan & Lucas, Nina & Dowling, Nicki & Delfabbro, Paul, 2023. "“It’s like you’re not even there…”: Gambling harm experienced by children of gambling parents," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    3. Ingo Fiedler, 2018. "Regulation of online gambling," Economics and Business Letters, Oviedo University Press, vol. 7(4), pages 162-168.
    4. Justus Haucap & Radivoje Nedic & Talha Şimşek, 2023. "Regulatory objectives vs fiscal interests: Are German casino locations motivated by beggar-thy-neighbor policy? An empirical analysis," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 55(2), pages 291-311, April.
    5. Maria Anna Donati & Silvia Cabrini & Daniela Capitanucci & Caterina Primi & Roberta Smaniotto & Maurizio Avanzi & Eleonora Quadrelli & Giovanna Bielli & Alfredo Casini & Alessandra Roaro, 2021. "Being a Gambler during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Study with Italian Patients and the Effects of Reduced Exposition," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-19, January.
    6. Min Ah Kim & JongSerl Chun & HaiSun Shim, 2022. "Using Photovoice With Male Problematic Gamblers to Understand Their Lived Story on the Path to Recovery in South Korea," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, May.
    7. Awaworyi Churchill, Sefa & Smyth, Russell, 2021. "Locus of control and energy poverty," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    8. Gathoni Ndung’u Benson & Simon Munayi & Janet Wanjira & justus Inyega, 2021. "Investigating the effects of online sports betting on the perceived social wellbeing of student athletes," International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy (2687-2293), Bussecon International Academy, vol. 3(2), pages 62-72, April.
    9. Sari Castrén & Kalle Lind & Heli Hagfors & Anne H. Salonen, 2021. "Gambling-Related Harms for Affected Others: A Finnish Population-Based Survey," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-11, September.
    10. Mahendru, Mandeep & Sharma, Gagan Deep & Pereira, Vijay & Gupta, Mansi & Mundi, Hardeep Singh, 2022. "Is it all about money honey? Analyzing and mapping financial well-being research and identifying future research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 417-436.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:intgms:v:16:y:2016:i:3:p:373-390. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RIGS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.