IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/intgms/v14y2014i2p301-317.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Games of chance or masters of illusion: multiline slots design may promote cognitive distortions

Author

Listed:
  • Kevin Harrigan
  • Vance MacLaren
  • Dan Brown
  • Mike J. Dixon
  • Charles Livingstone

Abstract

Problem gamblers often have distorted beliefs about gambling, including illusion of control and gambler's fallacy. Most multiline slots games allow players to adjust the number of wagered paylines and the amount bet per line, and over time this control may support incorrect conclusions and promote distorted gambling beliefs. We created software to run simulations of a popular multiline slots game and examined the effects of betting on single versus multiple paylines. Simultaneous multiline betting tends to produce a less varied gambling experience because it increases the frequency of legitimate wins and 'losses disguised as wins', while decreasing the occurrence of 'big wins'. It also shortens consecutive series of losing spins and it prolongs the time a typical player takes to exhaust funds. Indirect control over losing streaks may give some players the false impression that they can play skilfully and predict the occurrence of wins. However, applying five different wagering strategies in our simulations showed that none had any real effect on the average percentage of wagers that would be 'paid back' to players as prizes. Player control over multiline slots games may lead frequent gamblers to incorrect conclusions that sustain excessive play despite recurring losses.

Suggested Citation

  • Kevin Harrigan & Vance MacLaren & Dan Brown & Mike J. Dixon & Charles Livingstone, 2014. "Games of chance or masters of illusion: multiline slots design may promote cognitive distortions," International Gambling Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(2), pages 301-317, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:intgms:v:14:y:2014:i:2:p:301-317
    DOI: 10.1080/14459795.2014.918163
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14459795.2014.918163
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14459795.2014.918163?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nigel E. Turner & Masood Zangeneh & Nina Littman-Sharp, 2006. "The Experience of Gambling and its Role in Problem Gambling," International Gambling Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(2), pages 237-266.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Giuseppe Coco & Daniele Simone & Laura Serlenga & Sabrina Molinaro, 2023. "Risk awareness and complexity in students’ gambling," Economia Politica: Journal of Analytical and Institutional Economics, Springer;Fondazione Edison, vol. 40(3), pages 971-994, October.
    2. Jean-Jacques Rémond & Lucia Romo, 2018. "Analysis of Gambling in the Media Related to Screens: Immersion as a Predictor of Excessive Use?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ricijas, Neven & Dodig Hundric, Dora & Huic, Aleksandra, 2016. "Predictors of adverse gambling related consequences among adolescent boys," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 168-176.
    2. Terri-Lynn MacKay & David C. Hodgins, 2011. "Cognitive distortions as a problem gambling risk factor in Internet gambling," International Gambling Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(2), pages 163-175, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:intgms:v:14:y:2014:i:2:p:301-317. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RIGS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.