Author
Listed:
- Luz Mairena Semeah
- Shanti P. Ganesh
- Xinping Wang
- Diane C. Cowper Ripley
- Zaccheus James Ahonle
- Mi Jung Lee
- Tatiana Orozco
- Jennifer Hale-Gallardo
- Huanguang Jia
Abstract
Inaccessible home environments that create barriers to the enjoyment and the approachability of the living space impact some U.S. Veterans. Injuries acquired while serving in the military or developed through the aging process complicate matters for Veterans with disabilities. Home modifications (HM) afforded by the Home Improvements and Structural Alterations (HISA) program can increase accessibility. We examine the difference between urban and rural Veterans in their health service utilization (hospitalization versus outpatient encounters) 12 months before and 12 months after their HISA use. All the study patients were Veterans with disabilities who use the HISA program. There is a significant decrease in hospitalization post-HM as compared with pre-HM provision for all HM users. There is a significant increase in outpatient encounters post-HM as compared with pre-HM provision for all users. Rural vs. urban status was only significant in outpatient encounters 12 months pre-provision of HM. Provision of HM is associated with favorable clinical outcomes such as decreased hospitalization and increased preventative outpatient care visits. Our findings suggest some subset of hospitalizations could be prevented or delayed if timely and appropriate outpatient care is accessible to patients along with HM. Increasing the provision of HM services such as HISA can free up hospital beds, reduce cost to both individuals and institutions, decrease the risk of hospital acquired morbidity, and promote community integration.
Suggested Citation
Luz Mairena Semeah & Shanti P. Ganesh & Xinping Wang & Diane C. Cowper Ripley & Zaccheus James Ahonle & Mi Jung Lee & Tatiana Orozco & Jennifer Hale-Gallardo & Huanguang Jia, 2021.
"Home Modification and Health Services Utilization by Rural and Urban Veterans With Disabilities,"
Housing Policy Debate, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(6), pages 862-874, November.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:houspd:v:31:y:2021:i:6:p:862-874
DOI: 10.1080/10511482.2020.1858923
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:houspd:v:31:y:2021:i:6:p:862-874. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RHPD20 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.