IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/ginixx/v39y2013i4p461-488.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Female Peacekeepers and Gender Balancing: Token Gestures or Informed Policymaking?

Author

Listed:
  • Sabrina Karim
  • Kyle Beardsley

Abstract

Since the United Nations Security Council adopted Resolution 1325 (2000), which is referenced in most of the mandates for peacekeeping authorizations and renewals as of its adoption, UN peacekeeping forces have begun a process of gender balancing. While we have seen an increase in the numbers of female peacekeepers during the decade 2000--2010 and variation in the distribution patterns of female military personnel, we do not know if female military peacekeepers are deploying to areas that are safest or to areas with the greatest need for gender-balanced international involvement. Because the decision-making authority in the allocation of peacekeeping forces rests with the troop-contributing countries, which might not have bought into the gender balancing and mainstreaming initiatives mandated by the UN Security Council, we propose and find evidence that female military personnel tend to deploy to areas where there is least risk. They tend not to deploy where they may be most needed—where sexual violence and gender equity has been a major problem—and we find only a modest effect of having specific language in the mandates related to gender issues.

Suggested Citation

  • Sabrina Karim & Kyle Beardsley, 2013. "Female Peacekeepers and Gender Balancing: Token Gestures or Informed Policymaking?," International Interactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(4), pages 461-488, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:ginixx:v:39:y:2013:i:4:p:461-488
    DOI: 10.1080/03050629.2013.805131
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03050629.2013.805131
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03050629.2013.805131?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Laura Huber & Sabrina Karim, 2018. "The internationalization of security sector gender reforms in post-conflict countries," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 35(3), pages 263-279, May.
    2. Vesna Trut & Petra Sinovčić & Boris Milavić, 2022. "Initial Validation of the Ambivalent Sexism Inventory in a Military Setting," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-22, April.
    3. Jussi Heikkilä & Ina Laukkanen, 2022. "Gender-specific Call of Duty: A Note on the Neglect of Conscription in Gender Equality Indices," Defence and Peace Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(5), pages 603-615, July.
    4. Louise Olsson & Frida Möller, 2013. "Data on Women's Participation in UN, EU, and OSCE Field Missions: Trends, Possibilities, and Problems," International Interactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(4), pages 587-600, September.
    5. Louise Olsson & Theodora-Ismene Gizelis, 2013. "An Introduction to UNSCR 1325," International Interactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(4), pages 425-434, September.
    6. Chantal de Jonge Oudraat, 2013. "UNSCR 1325—Conundrums and Opportunities," International Interactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(4), pages 612-619, September.
    7. Karin Johansson, 2024. "Talk of shame: Conflict-related sexual violence and bilateral critique within the United Nations," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 61(3), pages 429-445, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:ginixx:v:39:y:2013:i:4:p:461-488. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/GINI20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.