IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/gcmbxx/v20y2017i7p750-759.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

To reduce the maximum stress and the stress shielding effect around a dental implant–bone interface using radial functionally graded biomaterials

Author

Listed:
  • H. Asgharzadeh Shirazi
  • M. R. Ayatollahi
  • A. Asnafi

Abstract

In a dental implant system, the value of stress and its distribution plays a pivotal role on the strength, durability and life of the implant–bone system. A typical implant consists of a Titanium core and a thin layer of biocompatible material such as the hydroxyapatite. This coating has a wide range of clinical applications in orthopedics and dentistry due to its biocompatibility and bioactivity characteristics. Low bonding strength and sudden variation of mechanical properties between the coating and the metallic layers are the main disadvantages of such common implants. To overcome these problems, a radial distributed functionally graded biomaterial (FGBM) was proposed in this paper and the effect of material property on the stress distribution around the dental implant–bone interface was studied. A three-dimensional finite element simulation was used to illustrate how the use of radial FGBM dental implant can reduce the maximum von Mises stress and, also the stress shielding effect in both the cortical and cancellous bones. The results, of course, give anybody an idea about optimized behaviors that can be achieved using such materials. The finite element solver was validated by familiar methods and the results were compared to previous works in the literature.

Suggested Citation

  • H. Asgharzadeh Shirazi & M. R. Ayatollahi & A. Asnafi, 2017. "To reduce the maximum stress and the stress shielding effect around a dental implant–bone interface using radial functionally graded biomaterials," Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(7), pages 750-759, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:gcmbxx:v:20:y:2017:i:7:p:750-759
    DOI: 10.1080/10255842.2017.1299142
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10255842.2017.1299142
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10255842.2017.1299142?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. M. Pérez & J. Prados-Frutos & J. Bea & M. Doblaré, 2012. "Stress transfer properties of different commercial dental implants: a finite element study," Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(3), pages 263-273.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marie Cronskär & John Rasmussen & Mats Tinnsten, 2015. "Combined finite element and multibody musculoskeletal investigation of a fractured clavicle with reconstruction plate," Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(7), pages 740-748, May.
    2. María Prados-Privado & Juan Carlos Prados-Frutos & José Luis Calvo-Guirado & José Antonio Bea, 2016. "A random fatigue of mechanize titanium abutment studied with Markoff chain and stochastic finite element formulation," Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(15), pages 1583-1591, November.
    3. Chao Wang & Lizhen Wang & Xiaoyu Liu & Yubo Fan, 2014. "Numerical simulation of the remodelling process of trabecular architecture around dental implants," Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(3), pages 286-295, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:gcmbxx:v:20:y:2017:i:7:p:750-759. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/gcmb .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.